CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What makes students click: working memory and look-up behavior

Chun, Dorothy M., Scott Payne, J.·2004·System
DOI 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Al Seghayer, 2001, The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study, Language Learning and Technology, 51, 202, 10.64152/10125/25117 · DOI
  2. Baddeley, 1998, The phonological loop as a language learning device, Psychological Review, 105, 158, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bensoussan, 1984, The effect of dictionary usage on EFL test performance compared with student and teacher attitudes and expectations, Reading in a Foreign Language, 2, 262, 10.64152/10125/66988 · DOI
  4. Budd, 1995, Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text, Memory Cognition, 23, 735, 10.3758/BF03200926 · DOI
  5. Cheung, 1996, Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning, Developmental Psychology, 32, 867, 10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.867 · DOI
  6. Chun, 1996, Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition, The Modern Language Journal, 80, 183, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chun, D.M., Plass, J.L., 1997. CyberBuch. Computer Program, Macintosh, St. Martin’s Press, New York
  8. Daneman, 1980, Individual differences in working memory and reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450, 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Davis, 1997, Computers and L2 reading: student performance, student attitudes, Foreign Language Annals, 30, 58, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb01317.x · DOI
  10. Engle, 2002, Working memory capacity as executive attention, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19, 10.1111/1467-8721.00160 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Harrington, 1992, L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25, 10.1017/S0272263100010457 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hegelheimer, 2004, Using CALL in the classroom: analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom, System, 32, 185, 10.1016/j.system.2003.11.007 · DOI
  13. Hulstijn, 1993, When do foreign-language readers look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence of task and learner variables, The Modern Language Journal, 77, 139
  14. Just, 1992, A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory, Psychological Review, 99, 122, 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Karp, A., 2001. The effects of glosses and tasks on vocabulary growth and retention for L2 readers of Spanish. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Davis
  16. King, 1991, Individual differences in syntactic processing: the role of working memory, Journal of Memory Language, 30, 580, 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90027-H · DOI
  17. Knight, 1994, Dictionary use while reading: the effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities, The Modern Language Journal, 78, 285, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02043.x · DOI
  18. Kost, 1999, Textual and pictorial glosses: effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language, Foreign Language Annals, 32, 89, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb02378.x · DOI
  19. Laufer, 2000, What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention?, Language Learning and Technology, 32, 58, 10.64152/10125/25073 · DOI
  20. Laufer, 1997, Bilingualised dictionaries: how learners really use them, System, 25, 361, 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00028-6 · DOI
  21. Leutner, 1998, Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: the visualizer/verbalizer behavior observation scale VV-BOS, Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 543, 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00023-5 · DOI
  22. Linderholm, 2002, The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778, 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778 · DOI
  23. Liu, 1995, Contextual enrichment through hypermedia technology: implications for second-language learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 439, 10.1016/0747-5632(95)80009-W · DOI
  24. Lomicka, 1998, To gloss or not to gloss: an investigation of reading comprehension online, Language Learning Technology, 12, 41, 10.64152/10125/25020 · DOI
  25. MacDonald, 1992, Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity, Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56, 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-K · DOI
  26. McLeod, 1986, Restructuring or automaticity. Reading in a second language, Language Learning, 36, 109, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00374.x · DOI
  27. Michael, 1999, The consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities for bilingual language processing, Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 59(8-B), 4503
  28. Michael, E.B., Gollan, T.H., in press. Predicting second language performance based on individual differences in cognitive capacity. In: Kroll, J.F., de Groot, A.M.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
  29. Papagno, 1991, Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning, Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331, 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90040-Q · DOI
  30. Papagno, 1995, Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48a, 98, 10.1080/14640749508401378 · DOI
  31. Payne, 2002, Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: output, working memory, and interlanguage development, CALICO Journal, 20, 7, 10.1558/cj.v20i1.7-32 · DOI
  32. Plass, 2003, Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities, Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221, 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8 · DOI
  33. Service, 1992, Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21, 10.1080/14640749208401314 · DOI
  34. Service, 1995, Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition?, Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155, 10.1017/S0142716400007062 · DOI
  35. Siribodhi, T., 1995. Effects of three interactive multimedia CALL programs on the vocabulary acquisition of elementary level EFL students. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas. Dissertation Abstracts International, 5609, p. 3552A
  36. Vos, 2001, Syntactic parsing and working memory: the effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load, Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 133
  37. Whitney, 1991, Working-memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension, Discourse Processes, 14, 133, 10.1080/01638539109544779 · DOI
  38. Yeung, 1998, Cognitive load and learner expertise: split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1, 10.1006/ceps.1997.0951 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
Chun, D. M., & Scott Payne, J.
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
481-503
ISSN
0346-251X
DOI
10.1016/j.system.2004.09.008
Cited by
77
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review