Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corrective feedback, learners' perceptions, and second language development

Rassaei, Ehsan·2013·System
DOI 10.1016/j.system.2013.05.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2013.05.002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Braidi, 2002, Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions, Lang. Learn., 52, 1, 10.1111/1467-9922.00176 · DOI
  2. Carpenter, 2006, Recasts and repetitions: learners’ interpretations of native speaker responses, Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition, 28, 209, 10.1017/S0272263106060104 · DOI
  3. Carroll, 1993, Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations, Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition, 15, 357, 10.1017/S0272263100012158 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Egi, 2010, Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: learner responses as language awareness, Mod. Lang. J., 94, 1, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x · DOI
  5. Ellis, 2006, Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar, Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition, 28, 339, 10.1017/S0272263106060141 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lightbown, 2000, Anniversary article: classroom SLA research and second language teaching, Appl. Linguistics, 21, 431, 10.1093/applin/21.4.431 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Loewen, 2006, Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness, Mod. Lang. J., 90, 536, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lyster, 1998, Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms, Lang. Learn., 48, 183, 10.1111/1467-9922.00039 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lyster, 2009, Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction, Lang. Learn., 59, 453, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mackey, 2007, Teachers' intentions and learners' perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom, Innovation Lang. Learn. Teach., 1, 129, 10.2167/illt047.0 · DOI
  11. Mackey, 1998, Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings?, Mod. Lang. J., 82, 338, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mackey, 2000, How do learners perceive interactional feedback?, Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition, 22, 471, 10.1017/S0272263100004022 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Muranoi, 2000, Focus on form through interaction enhancement: integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms, Lang. Learn., 50, 617, 10.1111/0023-8333.00142 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Oliver, 1995, Negative feedback in child NS–NNS conversation, Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition, 17, 459, 10.1017/S0272263100014418 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Panova, 2002, Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom, TESOL Q., 36, 573, 10.2307/3588241 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Rassaei, 2012, Recasts, metalinguistic feedback, and learners' perceptions: a case of Persian EFL learners, Innovation Lang. Learn. Teach., 10.1080/17501229.2012.744411 · DOI
  17. Rassaei, 2012, The effect of corrective feedback on the acquisition of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge, J. Lang. Learn. Teach., 2, 59
  18. Sheen, 2004, Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings, Lang. Teach. Res., 8, 263, 10.1191/1362168804lr146oa · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rassaei, E.
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
472-483
ISSN
0346-251X
DOI
10.1016/j.system.2013.05.002
Cited by
44
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.