The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings?
Abstract
This article examines the effects of negotiated interaction on the production and development of question forms in English as a second language (ESL). The study focused on one feature of interaction, recasts, which have recently been the topic of interactional work in the SLA literature (Long, 1996; Long, Inagaki, & Ortega, this issue; Lyster & Ranta, 1997; Oliver, 1995). The study compared groups of learners who received interactionally modified input with learners who received the same input containing intensive recasts in order to investigate: (a) the effect of recasts on learners' short term interlanguage (IL) development, and (b) the nature and content of learners' responses to recasts. The results suggest that for more advanced learners, interaction with intensive recasts may be more beneficial than interaction alone in facilitating an increase in production of targeted higher‐level morphosyntactic forms. These positive developmental effects were found for recasts even though, as is generally acknowledged in the discourse, recasts were usually not repeated and rarely elicited modification by the learners. This study, therefore, suggests that recasts may be beneficial for short term IL development even though they are not incorporated in learners' immediate responses. In fact, the responses may be red herrings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629 · cited 1×
“Lyster and Ranta (1997) noted that teachers tended to use recasts frequently although recasts were ineffective at eliciting student-generated repair.”
BackgroundSWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE
Lyster, R. (1998) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226319800103x · Cited by 718
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1017/S0272263100009736 · DOI
- Brock C., 1986, “Talking to learn”: Conversation in second language acquisition, 327
- Doughty C., 1993, Fine‐tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners, 96
- Ellis R., 1991, Language acquisition in the second/foreign language classroom, 179
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.90 · DOI
- Gass S. M., 1990, Second language acquisition: Foreign language learning, 34
- Gass S. M., 1991, Foreign/second language pedagogy research, 134
- Gass S. M., 1997, Input, interaction and the second language learner.
- 10.1017/S0272263100013097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0140525X00048950 · DOI
- Hatch E., 1978, Understanding second and foreign language learning, 34
- Krashen S. D., 1985, The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications.
- Long M. H., 1980, Input, interaction and second language acquisition.
- 10.1017/S0272263100004848 · DOI · Paper page
- Long M. H., 1985, Input in second language acquisition, 377
- 10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263100013103 · DOI · Paper page
- Mackey A., 1994, Using communicative tasks to target grammatical structures. A handbook of tasks and instructions for their use.
- Mackey A., 1994, Targeting morpho‐syntax in children's ESL: An empirical study of the use of interactive goal‐based tasks, Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 10, 67
- Mackey A., 1995, Stepping up the pace: Input, interaction and interlanguage development. An empirical study of questions in ESL.
- Mackey A., 1997, Stepping up the pace: Input, interaction and second language development.
- Mackey A., 1997, Interactional Modifications and the development of questions in English as a Second Language.
- Muranoi H.(1995 March).Impacts of interaction enhancement on learning the English article system. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference Chicago.
- 10.1093/elt/47.3.203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263100014418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01215.x · DOI
- Pica T, 1992, Text and context: Cross‐disciplinary perspectives on language study, 198
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3586992 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S027226310000783X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263100005015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/applin/10.1.52 · DOI · Paper page
- Pienemann M., 1987, Applying second language acquisition research, 45
- 10.1017/S0272263100007324 · DOI · Paper page
- Pienemann M., 1993, ESL development: Language and literacy in schools. Vol. 2: Documents on bandscale development and language acquisition, 115
- Pinker S., 1989, Learnability and cognition.
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01208.x · DOI
- Richardson M. A., 1993, Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition: Implications for SLA.
- Sato C. J., 1986, “Talking to learn”: Conversation in second language acquisition, 5
- 10.1017/S027226310000749X · DOI
- Schmidt R. W., 1994, Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics, AILA Review, 11, 11
- Schmidt R. W., 1986, “Talking to learn”: Conversation in second language acquisition, 237
- 10.1017/S0272263100011967 · DOI · Paper page
- Swain M., 1985, Input in second language acquisition, 235
- Swain M., 1995, Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, 125
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629
Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941
Evidence in support of written corrective feedback
Bitchener, J. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 · Cited by 871
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA: A Meta-Analysis
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990520 · Cited by 838
Metadata
- Authors
- MACKEY, A., & PHILP, J.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 338-356
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2051510403
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 98.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
- The paper
- MACKEY, A., & PHILP, J. (1998). Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings? The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.