Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modality has a significant effect on L2 performance.
“and that the modality also has a significant effect on L2 performance (Cho, 2018).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Cho, 2018
L2 learners exhibit higher syntactic complexity in oral English and more lexical richness in writing.
“Previous studies have argued that L2 learners exhibit higher syntactic complexity in oral English and more lexical richness in writing.”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Cho (2018)
The findings of this study are similar to those of Kormos and Trebits (2012), Zalbidea (2017), and Cho (2018).
“The findings are similar to those of Kormos and Trebits (2012), Zalbidea (2017), and Cho (2018).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Cho (2018)
Cites
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882 · see citing works
Chapter 6. Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance
Michel, M. C. (2011) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Previous studies have shown that syntactic network parameters vary across modalities (Liu, 2008), and that the modality also has a significant effect on L2 performance (Cho, 2018).”
Result
- Authors
- Cho, M.
- Affiliations
- Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Cho, Minyoung
- ORCID
- Cho, Minyoung
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 85-98
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767634256
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- task complexity, modality, working memory, syntactic complexity, fluency, accuracy, reading span, operation span, mediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
