Knockout of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor results in distinct hepatic and renal phenotypes in rats and mice
Abstract
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor which plays a role in the development of multiple tissues and is activated by a large number of ligands, including 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). In order to examine the roles of the AHR in both normal biological development and response to environmental chemicals, an AHR knockout (AHR-KO) rat model was created and compared with an existing AHR-KO mouse. AHR-KO rats harboring either 2-bp or 29-bp deletion mutation in exon 2 of the AHR were created on the Sprague-Dawley genetic background using zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN) technology. Rats harboring either mutation type lacked expression of AHR protein in the liver. AHR-KO rats were also insensitive to thymic involution, increased hepatic weight and the induction of AHR-responsive genes (Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2, Cyp1b1, Ahrr) following acute exposure to 25 μg/kg TCDD. AHR-KO rats had lower basal expression of transcripts for these genes and also accumulated ~30-45-fold less TCDD in the liver at 7 days post-exposure. In untreated animals, AHR-KO mice, but not AHR-KO rats, had alterations in serum analytes indicative of compromised hepatic function, patent ductus venosus of the liver and persistent hyaloid arteries in the eye. AHR-KO rats, but not AHR-KO mice, displayed pathological alterations to the urinary tract: bilateral renal dilation (hydronephrosis), secondary medullary tubular and uroepithelial degenerative changes and bilateral ureter dila…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In both rat and mouse AHR null models, AHRE-driven gene expression is blocked.
“This is despite the fact that, in both models, AHRE-driven gene expression is blocked (Harrill et al., 2013; J. V. Schmidt et al., 1996).”
From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013
Ahr null rats display different physiological and developmental phenotypes compared to Ahr null mice.
“Perhaps one of the most interesting findings from the Ahr null rat model is the observation that null rats display different physiological and developmental phenotypes as compared to the mouse null (Harrill et al., 2013).”
From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013
An Ahr null rat was made on an outbred SD background using zinc finger nuclease gene editing.
“Because of this reason, an Ahr null rat was made on an outbred SD background using the zinc finger nuclease (ZNF) gene editing technology (Harrill et al., 2013).”
From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013
In the rat Ahr null model, exon-2 encoding bHLH was targeted to compare with previously generated null mice.
“In the case of rat Ahr, exon-2, which encodes for the bHLH, was targeted in order to compare this model to previously generated null mice (Harrill et al., 2013; J. V. Schmidt et al., 1996).”
From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013
Cites
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex
Hankinson, O. (1995) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.001515 · Cited by 1,649 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Once in the nucleus, AHR binds to aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), dissociates from its cytosolic binding partners and binds dioxin-response elements (DREs) in the upstream promoter of AHR-regulated genes (Baba et al., 2001; Denison et al., 1989, 2011; Durrin and Whitlock, 1989; Hankinson, 1995;…”
BackgroundThe aryl hydrocarbon receptor links TH17-cell-mediated autoimmunity to environmental toxins
Veldhoen, M., Hirota, K., Westendorf, A. M., Buer, J., Dumoutier, L., Renauld, J.-C., & Stockinger, B. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06881 · Cited by 1,634 · see citing works
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex and the Control of Gene Expression
Beischlag, T. V., Morales, J. L., Hollingshead, B. D., & Perdew, G. H. (2008) · Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression · doi:10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v18.i3.20 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Lahvis, G. P., Lindell, S. L., Thomas, R. S., McCuskey, R. S., Murphy, C., Glover, E., Bentz, M., Southard, J., & Bradfield, C. A. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.190256997 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Self-citationBunger, M. K., Moran, S. M., Glover, E., Thomae, T. L., Lahvis, G. P., Lin, B. C., & Bradfield, C. A. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m209594200 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Bunger, M. K., Glover, E., Moran, S. M., Walisser, J. A., Lahvis, G. P., Hsu, E. L., & Bradfield, C. A. (2008) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn149 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rothhammer, V., & Quintana, F. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0125-8 · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
The Relationship between Typical Environmental Endocrine Disruptors and Kidney Disease
Zhang, X., Flaws, J. A., Spinella, M. J., & Irudayaraj, J. (2022) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics11010032 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Advances in Genome Editing and Application to the Generation of Genetically Modified Rat Models
Chenouard, V., Remy, S., Tesson, L., Ménoret, S., Ouisse, L.-H., Cherifi, Y., & Anegon, I. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.615491 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling
Wilson, R. H., & Bradfield, C. A. (2021) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.1080/03602532.2021.1955916 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Perhaps one of the most interesting findings from the Ahr null rat model is the observation that null rats display different physiological and developmental phenotypes as compared to the mouse null (Harrill et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
- Authors
- Harrill, J. A., Hukkanen, R. R., Lawson, M., Martin, G., Gilger, B., Soldatow, V., LeCluyse, E. L., Budinsky, R. A., Rowlands, J. C., & Thomas, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Research Triangle Park Foundation (US)
- Dow Chemical (United States) (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Russell S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 503-518
- ISSN
- 0041-008X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052597551
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- aryl hydrocarbon receptor, AhR knockout mice, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, TCDD, zinc finger nucleases, thymic involution, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, AHRR, liver function, patent ductus venosus, hyaloid artery, hydronephrosis, hydroureter, species differences in toxicity, histogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins, Animals, Kidney, Liver, Organ Size, Phenotype, Species Specificity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Gene Deletion, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Rats, Gene Knockdown Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review