Cited by 83Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Knockout of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor results in distinct hepatic and renal phenotypes in rats and mice

Harrill, Joshua A., Hukkanen, Renee R., Lawson, Marie, Martin, Greg, Gilger, Brian, Soldatow, Valerie, LeCluyse, Edward L., Budinsky, Robert A. +2 more·2013·Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor which plays a role in the development of multiple tissues and is activated by a large number of ligands, including 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). In order to examine the roles of the AHR in both normal biological development and response to environmental chemicals, an AHR knockout (AHR-KO) rat model was created and compared with an existing AHR-KO mouse. AHR-KO rats harboring either 2-bp or 29-bp deletion mutation in exon 2 of the AHR were created on the Sprague-Dawley genetic background using zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN) technology. Rats harboring either mutation type lacked expression of AHR protein in the liver. AHR-KO rats were also insensitive to thymic involution, increased hepatic weight and the induction of AHR-responsive genes (Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2, Cyp1b1, Ahrr) following acute exposure to 25 μg/kg TCDD. AHR-KO rats had lower basal expression of transcripts for these genes and also accumulated ~30-45-fold less TCDD in the liver at 7 days post-exposure. In untreated animals, AHR-KO mice, but not AHR-KO rats, had alterations in serum analytes indicative of compromised hepatic function, patent ductus venosus of the liver and persistent hyaloid arteries in the eye. AHR-KO rats, but not AHR-KO mice, displayed pathological alterations to the urinary tract: bilateral renal dilation (hydronephrosis), secondary medullary tubular and uroepithelial degenerative changes and bilateral ureter dila…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.taap.2013.06.024

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both rat and mouse AHR null models, AHRE-driven gene expression is blocked.

    “This is despite the fact that, in both models, AHRE-driven gene expression is blocked (Harrill et al., 2013; J. V. Schmidt et al., 1996).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013

  • Ahr null rats display different physiological and developmental phenotypes compared to Ahr null mice.

    “Perhaps one of the most interesting findings from the Ahr null rat model is the observation that null rats display different physiological and developmental phenotypes as compared to the mouse null (Harrill et al., 2013).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013

  • An Ahr null rat was made on an outbred SD background using zinc finger nuclease gene editing.

    “Because of this reason, an Ahr null rat was made on an outbred SD background using the zinc finger nuclease (ZNF) gene editing technology (Harrill et al., 2013).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013

  • In the rat Ahr null model, exon-2 encoding bHLH was targeted to compare with previously generated null mice.

    “In the case of rat Ahr, exon-2, which encodes for the bHLH, was targeted in order to compare this model to previously generated null mice (Harrill et al., 2013; J. V. Schmidt et al., 1996).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Harrill et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrill, J. A., Hukkanen, R. R., Lawson, M., Martin, G., Gilger, B., Soldatow, V., LeCluyse, E. L., Budinsky, R. A., Rowlands, J. C., & Thomas, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Research Triangle Park Foundation (US)
  • Dow Chemical (United States) (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Russell S.
Venue
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
272
Issue
2
Pages
503-518
ISSN
0041-008X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052597551
Cited by
83
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
aryl hydrocarbon receptor, AhR knockout mice, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, TCDD, zinc finger nucleases, thymic involution, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, AHRR, liver function, patent ductus venosus, hyaloid artery, hydronephrosis, hydroureter, species differences in toxicity, histogenesis
MeSH terms
Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins, Animals, Kidney, Liver, Organ Size, Phenotype, Species Specificity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Gene Deletion, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Rats, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review