Cited by 16Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesTeacher Education and Assessments

Evaluation of pre-service teachers' classroom management skills during teaching practice in rural communities

Open access
Mkhasibe, R.G., Mncube, D.W.·2020·South African Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

This study investigated the classroom management skills which are implemented by B.Ed. pre-service teachers to create and maintain an appropriate environment that is favourable for teaching and learning. It used a qualitative methodology. One of the universities in KwaZulu-Natal was used as a case study. Sixteen third-year B.Ed. pre-service teachers who were placed in uMkhanyakude District schools were purposively selected and observed during their teaching practice, and five subject mentors were interviewed to find out how they view student teachers’ capabilities of classroom management. The findings revealed that the pre-service teachers were less confident about classroom management skills because they were struggling to manage their classrooms while the efforts by subject mentors had little impact on how classes are managed. For instance, they were not exposed to the established basic rules to reinforce the consequences of misbehaviour. This suggests that subject mentors have to step up the effort to close the gap as they are given the responsibility of mentoring pre-service teachers. They have to accompany pre-service teachers to classrooms and spend as much time as is necessary with them as part of confidence-building measures. Furthermore, the institutions in question have to upscale their classroom management programmes to ensure that pre-service teachers can cope with practical realities and dynamic conditions in the classroom to manage better during teaching practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20853/34-6-4079

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Aworanti, O. A. 2016. Information and communications technology (ICT) in Nigerian educational assessment system: Emerging challenges. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(6): 1351- 1356.
  2. Beare, P., C. Torgerson, S. Tracz and C. Grutzik. 2012. Selectivity standards for admission to educator preparation: Principal evaluation of teachers and teacher diversity. Teacher Education Quarterly 39(1): 159-173
  3. Clement, M. T. 2010. What cooperating teachers are teaching pre-service teachers about classroom management? The Teachers Education 38(1): 47-62.
  4. Hildenbrand, S. M and K. Arndt. 2016. Pre-service teachers' management practices in elementary classrooms. An International Journal of Teachers' Professional Development 20(2): 147-161.
  5. Ingersoll, R. M and M. Strong. 2011. The impact of induction and mentoring for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research 81(2): 201-233.
  6. Kelly, M. C. 2007. How to handle discipline problems with effective classroom management? New York: Academic Press.
  7. Korkut, U. 2007. The 2006 Hungarian Election: Economic competitiveness versus Hungarian solidarity. Parliamentary Affairs 60(4): 675-690.
  8. Landau, B. M. 2004. The art of classroom management: Building an equitable learning community. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  9. Marais, P. 2016. "We can't believe what we see": Overcrowded classrooms through the eyes of pre- service teachers. South African Journal of Education 36(2): 1-10.
  10. Martin, N. K., N. J. Schafer, S. McClowry, E. T. Emmer, M. Brekelmans and T. Wubbels. 2016. Expanding the definition of classroom management: Recurring themes and new conceptualizations. The Journal of Classroom Interaction 51(1): 31-41.
  11. Marzano, R. J. and J. S. Marzano. 2013. Building classroom management. Educational Leadership 61(1): 6-13.
  12. Thornton, J. C. and M. R. Luthy. 2019. Using management principles to better acculturate students to classroom behaviour: A professionalism statement. Global Journal of Business Pedagogy 3(1): 105.
  13. Williams, C. 2007. Research methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research 5(3): 65-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mkhasibe, R. G., & Mncube, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Zululand (ZA)
Venue
South African Journal of Higher Education
Published
2020-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1011-3487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-5913
OpenAlex
W3112110483
Cited by
15
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
South African Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
classroom management, pre-service teachers, teaching practice, rural schools, teacher confidence, classroom rules, student misbehavior, mentoring, teacher professional development, KwaZulu-Natal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review