The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effective Reflective Practice: In Search of Meaning in Learning about Teaching
Loughran, J. J. (2002) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487102053001004 · Cited by 1,231
Teaching Student Teachers to Reflect
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j18v7162275t1w3w · Cited by 1,192
Peer assessment: judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks
Davies, P. (2006) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703290500467566 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Bennett, S. V. (2013) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085912452155 · Cited by 83
“Reflective practice plays a significant role in teaching and learning processes as Dewey (1933) emphasized the importance of integration of experiences with problem solving, reflection, and theory connected with practice (Harford & MacRuairc, 2008).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G.
- Venue
- Teaching and Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1884-1892
- ISSN
- 0742-051X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154043714
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 51.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.010
- The paper
- Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
