The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259
Cited by
The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push
Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., & Hague, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015 · Cited by 658
A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory
Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x · Cited by 547
Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan
Chen, M.-F., Lin, Y.-P., & Cheng, T.-J. (2013) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, S. T.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 161-185
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013596439
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
