Cited by 547Business Strategies and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory

Yu, Dan, Hang, Chang Chieh·2010·International Journal of Management Reviews

Abstract

Disruptive Innovation Theory has created a significant impact on management practices and aroused plenty of rich debate within academia. Copious as the studies are, the scattered and conflicting nature of the literature on disruptive innovation in the last decade may pose a state of ambiguity for future research, thus necessitating a comprehensive review at this juncture. This paper first clarifies the basic concept and potential misinterpretations of the theory. Believing in the predictive value of the theory on firm performance, the authors then summarize and critique the research on how to enable potential disruptive innovation from internal, external, marketing and technology perspectives. The different perspectives inspired the authors to identify a number of key research directions within the disruptive innovation research domain. Potential future research is also briefly discussed by integrating disruptive innovation with other research domains, such as open innovation. Finally, in addition to theoretical contributions, the authors make practical contributions by outlining a series of potential inhibitors and enablers of disruptive innovation as managerial ‘take‐aways’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The macro view of TLC holds that technological evolution, technological progression, and technological progression within industries and industry evolution are central to the technology evolution model.

    “The macro view of TLC understands that technological evolution, technological progression, and technological progression within industries and industry evolution are central to the technology evolution model [111,112].”
  • The next step in the TLC cycle is the era of evolution where incremental changes are made for the selected technology.

    “The next step in this cycle is the era of evolution where incremental changes are made for the selected technology. Refs. [112,113] describes these changes as evolutionary, continuous, incremental, or 'nuts and bolts' technologies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, D., & Hang, C. C.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
ORCID
Yu, Dan
Venue
International Journal of Management Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-05
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
435-452
ISSN
  • 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2370
OpenAlex
W2161611374
Cited by
547
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
FWCI
34.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Management Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
disruptive innovation, innovation theory, firm performance, open innovation, internal innovation, external innovation, marketing perspective, technology perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review