The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies
Open accessAbstract
Innovation is characterized by uncertainties, high risks, large investments and late returns on investment which make it a complex process. This is particularly true for sustainable innovation where market forces alone cannot be relied upon to realize the desired transitions. Insight in the dynamics of such innovation processes is necessary in order to influence technological change toward a more sustainable direction. However, few instruments and indicators are available to assess the performance of emerging technological innovation systems. In this phase competition often takes place based on expectations rather than on technological performance. This paper therefore focuses on the expectation patterns of technological innovation systems in the exploratory phase through the analysis of the expectation dynamics of three emerging technologies in the field of sustainable mobility within the Netherlands: biofuels, hydrogen as a transport fuel and natural gas as a transport fuel. These technologies do not only compete with the current fossil-fuel based system but also with each other. We have collected over 5000 expectation events regarding these technologies for the period 2000–2008 and discuss the insights generated by the comparison of the observed expectation dynamics to theoretical patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 1×
“Proponents of a certain technology often make an effort to frame the discussion about competing technologies in such a way that the strengths of their preferred technology become important performance criteria in the process of technology selection [47,48].”
BackgroundTechnological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics
Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01236366 · Cited by 804
Cited by
The hype cycle model: A review and future directions
Dedehayir, O., & Steinert, M. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005 · Cited by 425
Enhancing ICT for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa
Asongu, S. A., & Le Roux, S. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.026 · Cited by 406
Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling
Nemet, G. F., Callaghan, M. W., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Hartmann, J., Hilaire, J., Lamb, W. F., Minx, J. C., Rogers, S., & Smith, P. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 · Cited by 343
The role of governance in mobile phones for inclusive human development in sub-Saharan Africa
Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.04.002 · Cited by 280
Willems, K., Smolders, A., Brengman, M., Luyten, K., & Schöning, J. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.066 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Alkemade, F., & Suurs, R. A. A.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 448-456
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146616970
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
