The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach
Abstract
Internet of Things based applications for smart homes, wearable health devices, and smart cities are in the evolutionary stage in India. Adoption of Internet of Things is still limited to a few application areas. In developing countries, the usefulness of IOT's adoption is recognized as a key factor for economic and social development of a country by both academicians and practitioners as well. Currently, there are still very few studies that explore the adoption of Internet of Things from a multiple theory perspective, namely, The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This research aims to satisfy a clear gap in the main field of research by proposing a Structured Equation Model (SEM) approach to test three competing models in the context of Internet of Things in India. With respect to previous literature, this research sets the stage for extensive research in a broad domain of application areas for the Internet of Things, like healthcare, elderly well- being and support, smart cities and smart supply chains etc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013)
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114526928 · Cited by 3,332
Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model
Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240410542652 · Cited by 1,772
Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model
Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016 · Cited by 1,353
Cited by
Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework
Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.024 · Cited by 530
Smart city governance in developing countries: a systematic literature review
Tan, S., & Taeihagh, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12030899 · Cited by 491
Internet of Things research in supply chain management and logistics: A bibliometric analysis
Rejeb, A., Simske, S., Rejeb, K., Treiblmaier, H., & Zailani, S. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100318 · Cited by 384
Queiroz, M. M., Fosso Wamba, S., De Bourmont, M., & Telles, R. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1803511 · Cited by 339
E-health and wellbeing monitoring using smart healthcare devices: An empirical investigation
Papa, A., Mital, M., Pisano, P., & Del Giudice, M. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.018 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mital, M., Chang, V., Choudhary, P., Papa, A., & Pani, A. K.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 339-346
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2600217495
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 33.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001
- The paper
- Mital, M., Chang, V., Choudhary, P., Papa, A., & Pani, A. K. (2018). Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
