The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing
Abstract
Abstract Although 3D printing is a collection of digital manufacturing technologies, the speed of its adoption has not been quite what the market has expected. The purpose of this research is to examine the organizational perspectives and factors that are influencing the adoption of 3D printing. This paper presents a hybrid approach to the integrated analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technology-organizational-environment (TOE) framework, in order to set up a proper evaluation model that can prioritize the impact of such factors. An empirical study has been carried out on Taiwanese manufacturing enterprises, a considerable amount of information has been revealed that can help manufacturers understand those key factors better. Finally, the results herein provide decision-makers a way to discover more effective strategies to adopt 3D printing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Drazin, R. (1991) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/bf02371446 · Cited by 2,122
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487 · Cited by 1,440
Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00073-8 · Cited by 1,335
The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework
Baker, J. (2012) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12 · Cited by 1,275
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry
Wang, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-S., & Yang, Y.-F. (2010) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006 · Cited by 912
An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs
Chan, F. T. S., Yee-Loong Chong, A., & Zhou, L. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.004 · Cited by 202
The assimilation of RFID technology by Chinese companies: A technology diffusion perspective
Wei, J., Lowry, P. B., & Seedorf, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.05.001 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Queiroz, M. M., Fosso Wamba, S., De Bourmont, M., & Telles, R. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1803511 · Cited by 339
Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: The role of sustainability
Niaki, M. K., Torabi, S. A., & Nonino, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.019 · Cited by 298
Stornelli, A., Ozcan, S., & Simms, C. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104229 · Cited by 268
Adoption of AI-empowered industrial robots in auto component manufacturing companies
Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Mariani, M., Rana, N. P., Yang, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1882689 · Cited by 195
Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing
Holzmann, P., Schwarz, E. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9693-1 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeh, C.-C., & Chen, Y.-F.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 209-216
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789554792
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 26.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.