CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,335Technology Adoption and User BehaviourERP Systems Implementation and ImpactBig Data and Business Intelligence

A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework

Kuan, Kevin K.Y., Chau, Patrick Y.K.·2001·Information & Management
DOI 10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00073-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00073-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T-O-E framework has robust empirical support in the IS field more than other adoption frameworks such as TAM, IDT, TRA, SM, and TPB.

    “T-O-E framework is more holistic and size and industry friendly (Wen & Chen, 2010), has robust empirical support in IS field more than other adoption frameworks (e.g.TAM, IDT, TRA, SM, and TPB) (Henriksen, 2006;Hong, Thong, & Tam, 2006;Kuan & Chau, 2001;Yoon & George, 2013;Zheng, Yen, & Tarn, 2011;Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003) and meets the contemporary scholarly demand (Barrett, Grant, & Wailes, 2006”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Kuan & Chau, 2001

  • T-O-E framework emerges as a widespread theoretical perspective specific to the IS domain; its variables have been severally tested on the adoption of several other technologies including EDI, KM, e-business, RFID, e-commerce, enterprise systems, and e-procurement.

    “T-O-E framework emerges as a widespread theoretical perspective specific to IS domain; therefore, its variables have been severally tested on the adoption of several other technologies-EDI, KM, e-business, RFID, e-commerce, enterprise systems, and e-procurement (Kuan & Chau, 2001;Wang et al., 2010;Zhu, Kraemer, Xu, & Dedrick, 2004).”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Kuan & Chau, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chau, Patrick Y.K.
ORCID
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
507-521
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00073-8
OpenAlex
W2039421131
Cited by
1,335
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 72
FWCI
49.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Information & Management (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
electronic data interchange, EDI adoption, small business, technology-organization-environment framework, perceived benefits, financial costs, technical skills, government pressure, industry pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review