The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda
Abstract
Abstract This paper provides a structured literature review of digital entrepreneurship to generate insights into recent developments in the field, critique the research to date, and identify opportunities for future research. We have applied the three aspects of critical research – insight, critique, and transformative redefinition – to analyse and synthesise the literature. We distil the definitions of the key constructs and identify three research development phases corresponding to practice development. Analysis of 133 scholarly articles by discipline, time, methodology, geography and theoretical focus informs that digital entrepreneurship research has been fragmented, divergent and slow to respond to practice. However, the field is now rapidly acquiring legitimacy and an identity, growing rapidly and is becoming more interdisciplinary. We explore how established views of entrepreneurial processes and clusters are being upended in a digital world. In outlining the future of the field, a preponderance of single case study and conceptual articles need to be supplemented with longitudinal, mixed methods, multiple case study and quantitative research. More integrative research, preferably presented as dynamic models, would advance the field. Design and action research output, and collaborations with practitioners will yield practice-driven insights. This paper will facilitate an interdisciplinary dialogue for evidence-informed policy and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 · Cited by 11,223
Business models, business strategy and innovation
Teece, D. J. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 · Cited by 8,335
Business Model Generation : A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 6,869
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.187 · Cited by 5,564
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3 · Cited by 4,392
Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
Shaw, M. J., Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259025 · Cited by 4,124
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 3,759
“Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question
Gartner, W. B. (1988) · American Journal of Small Business · doi:10.1177/104225878801200401 · Cited by 3,378
(2011) · Cited by 3,330
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 148
- Pages
- 119735
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972797477
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 138
- FWCI
- 68.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
- The paper
- Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.