The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Big data analytics capabilities and performance: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Big data analytics (BDA) have the power to revolutionize traditional ways of doing business. Nevertheless, the impact of BDA capabilities on a firm's performance is still not fully understood. These capabilities relate to the flexibility of the BDA infrastructure and the skills of the management and the firm's personnel. Most scholars explored the phenomenon from either a theoretical standpoint or neglected intermediate factors, such as organizational traits. This article builds on the dynamic capabilities view to propose and empirically test a model exploring whether organizational ambidexterity and agility mediate the relationship between BDA capabilities and organizational performance. Using data from surveys of 259 managers of large European organizations, we tested a proposed model using bootstrapped moderated mediation analysis. We found that organizational BDA capabilities affect a firm's ambidexterity and agility, which, in turn, affect its performance. These results establish ambidexterity and agility as positive mediators in the relationship between organizational BDA capabilities and a firm's performance. Furthermore, the organizational resistance to the implementation of information management systems and the fit between the organization and these systems also moderated this relationship. Practical implications for managers are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
(2017) · Cited by 16,319
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703503 · Cited by 6,250
(2011) · Cited by 5,203
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Davenport, 2012, How ‘big data’ is different, MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., 54, 43
- LaValle, 2011, Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value, MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., 52, 21
Cited by
Benzidia, S., Makaoui, N., & Bentahar, O. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120557 · Cited by 703
Awan, U., Shamim, S., Khan, Z., Zia, N. U., Shariq, S. M., & Khan, M. N. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120766 · Cited by 571
“Despite BDA potential, however, there is relatively limited research that has empirically explored the antecedents of data-driven insights for enhancing decision-making quality (Rialti, Zollo, Ferraris, & Alon, 2019), and its impact on CE performance (Gupta et al., 2019).”
BackgroundUnveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance
Usai, A., Fiano, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Paoloni, P., Farina Briamonte, M., & Orlando, B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.035 · Cited by 553
Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375 · Cited by 316
Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: an integrated MCDM approach
Yasmin, M., Tatoglu, E., Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.028 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Rialti, R., Zollo, L., Ferraris, A., & Alon, I.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 119781
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982493052
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 52.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Big data analytics capabilities and performance: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119781
- The paper
- Rialti, R., Zollo, L., Ferraris, A., & Alon, I. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and performance: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.