Cited by 42Technology Adoption and User BehaviourMobile Learning in EducationHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Behavioral intention to continuously use learning apps: A comparative study from Taiwan universities

Huang, Duen-Huang, Chueh, Hao-En·2022·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121531

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, D.-H., & Chueh, H.-E.
Affiliations
  • Chaoyang University of Technology (TW)
  • Chung Yuan Christian University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chueh, Hao-En
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
177
Pages
121531
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210328713
Cited by
42
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
behavioral intention, language learning apps, continuance intention, technology acceptance, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, self-efficacy, facilitating conditions, kinesthetic learners, university students, digital language learning, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review