Cited by 69Mobile Learning in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Exploring the factors influencing student’s intention to use mobile learning in Indonesia higher education

Sidik, Darlan, Syafar, Faisal·2020·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-019-10018-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sidik, D., & Syafar, F.
Affiliations
State University of Makassar (ID)
Corresponding author
Sidik, Darlan
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2020-05-02
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
4781-4796
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W3022268244
Cited by
68
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • Eprints (Universitas Negeri Makassar) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
non-tax state revenue (PNBP) of Universitas Negeri Makassar (2573/UN36.9/LT/2017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
mobile learning, technology acceptance, UTAUT, intention to use, university students, higher education, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, external influence, service quality, individual innovativeness, Indonesia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review