The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers
Open accessAbstract
This paper attempts to use an integrated theory based on a firm’s internal and external sources of knowledge framework to analyze how different are R&D from non-R&D activities to innovate, specially in a context of low and medium low tech (LMT) sectors where most of the firms are SMEs. Simultaneously, the paper also explores the key differences between R&D and non-R&D innovators. The empirical analysis is based on a representative panel of 2023 Spanish manufacturing firms for 2005 and 2006 from the Spanish Ministry of Industry. Innovation in product and process is explained using non-R&D variables such as in Marketing, Design or hiring tertiary degree employees. Only innovation in product is explained by R&D expenditures. Addressing innovation in process, R&D variables work in few cases and neither R&D expenditures but occasionally R&D employees and are specially relevant the non-R&D variables. The interaction (moderating) effect is specially negative and significant, addressing the substitution effect with different implications regarding product or process innovation. Therefore, innovation can be explained using non-R&D variables such as investments in Marketing, Design, and other routines linked to human resources, technology monitoring committees or the existence of a formal plan to innovate. The firms with more internal resources, those which conduct R&D activities present a better AC and it leads to engage in cooperation agreements and access to external flows of knowledge. The paper has important implications for policymakers due to the fact that most of policies for R&D are based on R&D programmes, while there are other realities: non-R&D factors which also explain innovation, specially when considering low tech sector contexts. El presente articulo usa la teoria de recursos y capacidades para, a traves de los recursos internos y externos de las empresas, analizar las actividades de R&D y las actividades de no-R&D en su impacto sobre la performance de innovacion de la empresa, en un contexto sectorial de baja y media tecnologia. Asimismo, el articulo explora el rol innovador de las empresas que hacen R&D y las que no lo hacen. Con una muestra de 2023 empresas manufactureras espanolas, obtenemos un comportamiento innovador para la innovacion en producto y en proceso y, sobre todo, observando que las actividades de R&D tienen muy poco peso explicativo sobre el resultado de innovacion. El articulo presenta implicaciones para la Academia y los policymakers, sobre todo por el hecho de que la mayoria de las politicas de innovacion se basan en actividades de R&D.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Capaldo, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.621 · Cited by 986 · cited 2×
“, 2001), although the debate on relational capabilities is still in its infancy (Capaldo, 2007).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Business Regulations on Nascent and Young Business Entrepreneurship
van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2007) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9014-1 · Cited by 813
R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation
Narula, R. (2004) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00045-7 · Cited by 602
Cited by
Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study
Lau, A. K. W., & Lo, W. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.005 · Cited by 273
Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Arribas, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.005 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Albors Garrigos, J., & Gil-Pechuan, I.
- Venue
- Technovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 427-446
- ISSN
- 0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030428601
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 23.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.006
- The paper
- Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Albors Garrigos, J., & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.