Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 796

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination

Oh, Deog-Seong, Phillips, Fred, Park, Sehee, Lee, Eunghyun·2016·Technovation
DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Broechler, R., de Voigt, S.A.A., 2013. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Science & Technology Parks (STPs), In: Proceedings of the UNESCO-WTA Cooperative Project, International Training Workshop, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, September 24–27
  2. Carayannis, 2009, ‘Mode 3’ and quadruple helix: Toward a 21st-century fractal innovation ecosystem, Int. J. Technol. Manag., 46, 201, 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chase, 1985, A theory of socioeconomic change: Entropic processes, technology, and evolutionary development, J. Econ. Issues, 19, 797, 10.1080/00213624.1985.11504437 · doi:10.1080/00213624.1985.11504437
  4. Chen, H., 2014. The supporting system of the science park: Case study of TusPark. In: Proceedings of the 2014 World Technopolis Association International Training Workshop, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, pp. 241–248
  5. Cohen, B., Almirall, E., Chesbrough, H., 2014. Call for papers – The city as a lab: open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review, 3–5. Retrieved from 〈http://cmr.berkeley.edu/cmr_special_issue_open_innovation_in_cities.pdf〉 · DOI
  6. Durst, S., Poutanen, P., 2013. Success factors of innovation ecosystems - Initial insights from a literature review. In: Smeds, R., Irrmann, O., (Eds.), Co-create 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-Design in Innovation. Aalto, Denmark, 27–38. Retrieved from 〈http://www.academia.edu/4007245/Success_factors_of_innovation_ecosystems_A_literature_review〉
  7. Eyuboglu, 2007, Quasi-Darwinian selection in marketing relationships, J. Mark., 71, 48, 10.1509/jmkg.71.4.048 · DOI
  8. Frenken, 1999, Variety and niche creation in aircraft, helicopters, motorcycles and minicomputers, Res. Policy, 28, 469, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00008-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Graham, R., 2013. Technology Innovation Ecosystem Benchmarking Study: Key findings from Phase 1. Cambridge,. Retrieved from 〈http://www.rhgraham.org/RHG/Recent_projects_files/Benchamrking study-Phase 1 summary.pdf〉.
  10. Hage, 2013, Ideas, innovations, and networks: A new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge, Policy Sci., 46, 199, 10.1007/s11077-012-9172-8 · DOI
  11. Haynes, 1971, Spatial change in urban structure: alternative approaches to ecological dynamics, Econ. Geogr., 47, 324, 10.2307/143214 · doi:10.2307/143214
  12. Hernández, J.G.V., Noruzi, M.R., Sariolghalam, N., 2007. Types of Relationships between Firms, Communities and Governments and their Obstacles (2003–2007). Available at SSRN: 〈http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014642〉 or 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1014642〉. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1014642
  13. Huggett, 2011, New startup models emerge as investor landscape shifts, Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 1066, 10.1038/nbt1211-1066c · doi:10.1038/nbt1211-1066c
  14. Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A., Mäntymäki, M., 2014. The influence of application developer multi-homing and keystone developers on competition between mobile application ecosystems. Working paper, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.14157abstract
  15. Kang, 2015, Institutions for regional innovation systems: the Korean case, World Technopolis Review, 4, 46, 10.7165/wtr2015.4.2.46 · doi:10.7165/wtr2015.4.2.46
  16. Lilienfeld, 2015, Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: a list of inaccurate, misleading, misused ambiguous, logically confused words phrases, Front. Psychol., 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100 · DOI
  17. Lin, Charles, 2014. The formation and building of creative spatial network and innovation ecosystem in Taipei: the territorial basis of development and governance strategies. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Daejeon Global Innovation Forum, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, pp. 301–311
  18. Linton, 2009, De-Babelizing the language of innovation, Technovation, 29, 729, 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.006 · DOI
  19. Lorré, Jean-Pierre, Carpentier, M., Fabre, O., 2006. Collaborative distributed Framework for SME ecosystems: the group-buying portal use case. In: Dolgui, A., Morel, G., Pereira, C., (Eds.), 12th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, Ecole des Mines Saint Etienne, France, pp. 23-27 · doi:10.3182/20060517-3-fr-2903.00017
  20. Moore, 1993, Predators and prey: the new ecology of competition, Harv. Bus. Rev., 71, 75
  21. Papaioannou, T., Wield, D., Chataway, J., 2007. Knowledge ecologies and ecosystems? An empirically grounded reflection on recent developments in innovation systems theory. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Triple Helix Conference on University-Government-Industry Relations, May 16–18, 2007, Singapore, pp. 1–31. Retrieved from 〈http://oro.open.ac.uk/8550/1/conf106a51.pdf〉.
  22. Pearson/Infoplease Encyclopedia, 2014. Climax Communities. At: 〈http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/ecology-climax-communities.html〉 (accessed October 24.10.14.).
  23. Phillips, 2009, Advances in evolution and genetics: Implications for technology strategy, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 597, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.006 · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.006
  24. Pietsch, J., 2014. Transformations towards Smart Green City: Change management by innovation ecosystem building. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Daejeon Global Innovation Forum, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, pp. 295–300
  25. Rao, B., Jimenez, B., 2011. A comparative analysis of digital innovation ecosystems. In: Proceedings of PICMET 2011, Technology Management in the Energy Smart World, Portland, Oregon. Accessed at 〈http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6017799&url= http%3A//ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6017799〉.
  26. Ruddiman, 2015, Defining the epoch we live in, Science, 348, 38, 10.1126/science.aaa7297 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schot, 2007, Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change: A critical survey of the literature, J. Evol. Econ., 17, 605, 10.1007/s00191-007-0057-5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda and policy, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Seo, J., 2014. Building the platform to bring new ideas to startups in the creative economy. In: Proceedings of the 2014 World Technopolis Association International Training Workshop, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, pp. 249–259
  30. Ulrich, 1980, The metaphysics of design: a Simon-Churchman “Debate”, Interfaces, 10, 35, 10.1287/inte.10.2.35 · DOI
  31. Viitanen, J., Markkula, M., Soler, C.R., undated. VII. Systemic Development of Regional Innovation Ecosystems Modernizing the Triple Helix, pp. 101–116. Accessed at 〈http://www.academia.edu/3984588/Systemic_Development_of_Regional_Innovation_Ecosystems_Modernizing_the_Triple_Helix〉.
  32. Wallner, T., Menrad, M., 2011. Extending the innovation ecosystem framework. In: Proceedings of the XXII ISPIM Conference, Hamburg, Germany, (unpaginated). Retrieved from 〈http://www.agtil.at/uploads/images/PDFs/ISPIM_Wallner_final.pdf〉.
  33. Xu, 2007, Total innovation management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century, J. Technol. Transf., 32, 9, 10.1007/s10961-006-9007-x · DOI
  34. Zhang, 2014, Interaction of open innovation and business ecosystem, Int. J. – e-Serv. Sci. Technol., 7, 51

Cited by

See all 796

Metadata

Authors
Oh, D.-S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E.
Venue
Technovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
54
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
OpenAlex
W2291675887
Cited by
796
References
3
FWCI
98.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
The paper
Oh, D.-S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.