The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles
Abstract
A circular economy maximizes the value of material resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, resource use, waste and pollution. We will posit that circularity needs to be understood as a property of a system (e.g., the mobility system of a city), rather than a property of an individual product or service (e.g., a car or a car-sharing service). Hence, there is a need for more knowledge on how to innovate towards ‘circular ecosystems’. This study proposes a set of principles for ‘circular ecosystem innovation’, based on: 1) a concise literature review to retrieve recommended principles on how to successfully innovate in ecosystems, 2) a mobility case of circular ecosystem innovation to investigate how relevant and useful these principles are for circular oriented innovation. The case data include 20 interviews, workshop data and internal background documents. The identified principles can be categorized in three groups: 1) collaboration (i.e., how firms can interact with other organizations in their ecosystem to innovate towards circularity), 2) experimentation (i.e., how firms can organize a structured trial-and-error process to implement greater circularity) and 3) platformization (i.e., how firms can organize social and economic interactions via online platforms to achieve greater circularity). Future research may focus on identifying opportunities and barriers to applying these principles in different contexts than in the one that is investigated in the present study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By shifting from selling products to selling performance, access or outcomes, businesses can generate revenue through service fees or upgrade options and by maximising the retained asset value from controlled returns and remarketing of refurbished devices or components (Konietzko et al. 2020;Hobson 2021).”
From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Konietzko et al. 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Self-citationAnalyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Handbook of Qualitative Research
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80230-0 · Cited by 5,715
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Self-citationCradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0914 · Cited by 3,829
Cited by
Al-Shetwi, A. Q. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153645 · Cited by 703
Circular Economy in the WEEE industry: a systematic literature review and a research agenda
Bressanelli, G., Saccani, N., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Perona, M. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.05.007 · Cited by 226
Toward a circular value chain: impact of the circular economy on a company's value chain processes
Eisenreich, A., Füller, J., Stuchtey, M., & Gimenez-Jimenez, D. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134375 · Cited by 154
Don't adapt, shape! Use the crisis to shape your minimum viable system – And the wider market
Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.022 · Cited by 114
Circular business model evolution: Stakeholder matters for a self‐sufficient ecosystem
Moggi, S., & Dameri, R. P. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2716 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 253
- Pages
- 119942
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2997772599
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 59.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942
- The paper
- Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.