Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions?
Open accessAbstract
To navigate sustainability transitions, firms are often prompted to take an active role in business model innovation. Previous research has shown, however, that when attempting to change business models, incumbent firms frequently face challenges concerning the ambiguity of transition pathways. This paper is an inquiry into this intersection between business model innovation and sustainability transitions. Anchored in three case studies of sustainability-driven, pre-commercial projects of emerging technologies, it reveals how groups of organizations collaborate in time-limited, cross-industry networks, to explore potential business models for anticipated, profound, changes in socio-technical systems. Drawing on these findings, the paper introduces the concept of experimental networks and illustrates how experimental networks can facilitate business model innovation in relation to systemic change. By outlining the constituents of the experimental network concept, the paper contributes to theory by uncovering the interplay of interorganizational collaboration and network level business model innovation. In addition, it reveals how experimental networks constitute one way for incumbents to claim agency with respect to emerging sustainability transitions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245 · see citing works
Developing a unified framework of the business model concept
Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.21 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zheng, L. J., Zhang, J. Z., Yee Sum Lee, L., Jasimuddin, S. M., & Mustafa Kamal, M. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120978 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Engwall, M., Kaulio, M., Karakaya, E., Miterev, M., & Berlin, D.
- Affiliations
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Engwall, Mats
- Venue
- Technovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 102330
- ISSN
- 0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3173981780
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- VINNOVA
- Energimyndigheten
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- business model innovation, sustainability transitions, experimental network, incumbent firms, inter-organizational collaboration, emerging technologies, systemic change, socio-technical systems, organizational agency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review