CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marginalising household users in smart grids

Tarasova, Ekaterina, Rohracher, Harald·2023·Technology in Society
DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102185
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unless just and inclusive, transitions to low carbon-energy systems are unlikely to receive sufficient legitimacy and broad public support. While research on inequalities and injustices in energy transitions is growing, these issues remain less explored in the case of the digitalisation of the energy systems through smart grids and smart homes. This paper aims to synthetise our understandings of inequality, exclusion and vulnerability in energy transitions by systemically analysing different dimensions of marginalisation in the transition to a digitalised electricity infrastructure in Sweden. To synthetise understandings of marginalisation and exclusion, conceptualisations of these processes in different social science approaches to energy studies are reviewed. Moreover, an empirical analysis of interviews with a range of Swedish actors such as energy utilities, social housing developers or pensioner organisations is carried out and enriched by previous research on smart grid users. The empirical analysis demonstrates what specific forms that diverse categories of marginalisation, as already identified generally in different social science approaches to energy studies, may take in smart grids. We argue that marginalisation of household users in smart grids may take place along multiple dimensions, relating to matters of literacy, participation, infrastructure, and the economy. The analysis suggests that bundles of marginalisation aspects concerning household users in sustaina…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102185

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Calver, 2021, Demand response and energy justice : a critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures, Energy Pol., 151, 112198, 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112198 · DOI
  2. Kolotouchkina, 2022, Smart cities, the digital divide, and people with disabilities, Cities, 123, 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103613 · DOI
  3. Milchram, 2018, Energy justice and smart grid systems: evidence from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, Appl. Energy, 229, 1244, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.053 · DOI
  4. Milchram, 2020, Designing for justice in electricity systems: a comparison of smart grid experiments in the Netherlands, Energy Pol., 147, 111720, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111720 · DOI
  5. Sareen, 2021, Digitalisation and social inclusion in multi-scalar smart energy transitions, Energy Res. Social Sci., 81, 102251, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102251 · DOI
  6. Thomas, 2020, Energy justice discourses in citizen deliberations on systems flexibility in the United Kingdom: vulnerability, compensation and empowerment, Energy Res. Social Sci., 66, 101494, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101494 · DOI
  7. Wallsten, 2019, The discreet charm of activeness: the vain construction of efficient smart grid users, Journal of Cultural Economy 12 (6), 571, 10.1080/17530350.2019.1639067 · DOI
  8. Heffron, 2022, Applying energy justice into the energy transition, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 156, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111936 · DOI
  9. Martiskainen, 2021, New dimensions of vulnerability to energy and transport poverty, Joulr, 5, 3, 10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.016 · DOI
  10. Martiskainen, 2021, Temporality, consumption, and conflict: exploring user-based injustices in European low-carbon transitions, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 33, 770, 10.1080/09537325.2020.1841895 · DOI
  11. O’Sullivan, 2020, Uneven energy transitions: understanding continued energy peripheralization in rural communities, Energy Pol., 138, 111288, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111288 · DOI
  12. Sovacool, 2019, Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions, Climatic Change, 155, 581, 10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7 · DOI
  13. Sovacool, 2021, Who are the victims of low-carbon transitions? Towards a political ecology of climate change mitigation, Energy Res. Social Sci., 73, 101916, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Wang, 2021, Just transition: a conceptual review, Energy Res. Social, Sci., 82
  15. Berka, 2021, Decentralisation and inclusivity in the energy sector: preconditions, impacts and avenues for further research, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 138, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110663 · DOI
  16. Curran, 2020, Low-carbon transition as vehicle of new inequalities? Risk-class, the Chinese middle-class and the moral economy of misrecognition, Theor. Cult. Soc., 37, 131, 10.1177/0263276419869438 · DOI
  17. Shirani, 2020, ‘I’m the smart meter’: perceptions of smart technology amongst vulnerable consumers, Energy Pol., 144, 111637, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111637 · DOI
  18. Żuk, 2022, Energy ageism: the framework of the problem and the challenges of a just energy transition, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 43, 237, 10.1016/j.eist.2022.04.006 · DOI
  19. Sen, 2000, The social exclusion: concept, application, and scrutiny, Social Development Papers No. 1, Office of Environment and Social Development Asian Development Bank, Manila
  20. Gangale, 2013, Consumer engagement: an insight from smart grid projects in Europe, Energy Pol., 60, 621, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.031 · DOI
  21. Geelen, 2013, Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services, Energy Pol., 61, 151, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.107 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Bouzarovski, 2012, Energy poverty policies in the EU: a critical perspective, Energy Pol., 49, 76, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.033 · DOI
  23. Sovacool, 2012, The political economy of energy poverty: a review of key challenges, Energy for Sustainable, Development, 16, 272
  24. Bouzarovski, 2015, A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary, Energy Res. Social Sci., 10, 31, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007 · DOI
  25. Bouzarovski, 2017, Multiple transformations: theorizing energy vulnerability as a socio-spatial phenomenon, Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr., 99, 20, 10.1080/04353684.2016.1276733 · DOI
  26. Bartiaux, 2018, Energy justice, unequal access to affordable warmth, and capability deprivation: a quantitative analysis for Belgium, Appl. Energy, 225, 1219, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.113 · DOI
  27. Day, 2016, Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework, Energy Pol., 93, 255, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019 · DOI
  28. Chester, 2011, A new form of energy poverty is the hallmark of liberalised electricity sectors, Aust. J. Soc. Issues, 46, 435, 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2011.tb00228.x · DOI
  29. H. Thomson, C. Snell, S. Bouzarovski, Health, well-being and energy poverty in Europe: a comparative study of 32 European countries, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 14 (6) (2017), 584. · DOI
  30. Jenkins, 2016, Energy justice: a conceptual review, Energy Res. Social Sci., 1, 174, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · DOI
  31. Sovacool, 2015, Energy justice: conceptual insights and practical applications, Appl. Energy, 142, 435, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002 · DOI
  32. Heffron, 2017, The concept of energy justice across the disciplines, Energy Pol., 105, 658, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018 · DOI
  33. Healy, 2017, Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”, Energy Pol., 108, 451, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014 · DOI
  34. Sovacool, 2019, The whole systems energy injustice of four European low-carbon transitions, Global Environ. Change, 58, 101958, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101958 · DOI
  35. Jenkins, 2014, Energy justice: a whole systems approach, Queen's Political Review, 2, 74
  36. Golubchikov, 2020, Energy periphery: uneven development and the precarious geographies of low-carbon transition, Energy Build., 211, 109818, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109818 · DOI
  37. Liljenfeldt, 2017, Distributional justice in Swedish wind power development – an odds ratio analysis of windmill localization and local residents’ socio-economic characteristics, Energy Pol., 105, 648, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.007 · DOI
  38. Hillerbrand, 2021, Using the Capability Approach as a normative perspective on energy justice: insights from two case studies on digitalisation in the energy sector, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 22, 336, 10.1080/19452829.2021.1901672 · DOI
  39. Becker, 2017, Energy democracy: mapping the debate on energy alternatives, Geography Compass, 11, 1, 10.1111/gec3.12321 · DOI
  40. Burke, 2017, Energy democracy: goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions, Energy Res. Social Sci., 33, 35, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024 · DOI
  41. Szulecki, 2018, Conceptualizing energy democracy, Environ. Polit., 27, 21, 10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294 · DOI
  42. van Veelen, 2018, What is energy democracy? Connecting social science energy research and political theory, Energy Res. Social Sci., 46, 19, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.010 · DOI
  43. Szulecki, 2020, Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: a conceptual review, Energy Res. Social Sci., 69, 101768, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101768 · DOI
  44. van den Broek, 2019, Household energy literacy : a critical review and a conceptual typology, Energy Res. Social Sci., 57, 101256, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101256 · DOI
  45. DeWaters, 2011, Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): a measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior, Energy Pol., 39, 1699, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.049 · DOI
  46. Hess, 2020, Sociotechnical matters: reviewing and integrating science and technology studies with energy social science, Energy Res. Social Sci., 65, 101462, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101462 · DOI
  47. Sovacool, 2020, Sociotechnical agendas : reviewing future directions for energy and climate research, Energy Res. Social Sci., 70, 101617, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617 · DOI
  48. J. Summerton, Those Who Are Not Served? Exploring Exclusions and Suffering in Transport Infrastructures, in: G.C. Bowker, S. Timmermans, A.E. Clarke, E. Balka (Ed.), Boundary Objects and beyond. Working with Leigh Star, MIT Press, Cambridge/ London, 2015, pp. 459–471. · DOI
  49. McFarlane, 2008, Political infrastructures: governing and experiencing the fabric of the city, Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 32, 363, 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00792.x · DOI · Paper page
  50. Rodgers, 2012, Infrastructural violence: introduction to the special issue, Ethnography, 13, 401, 10.1177/1466138111435738 · DOI
  51. Phillips, 2021, The materiality of precarity: gender, race and energy infrastructure in urban South Africa, Environ. Plann., 53, 1031, 10.1177/0308518X20986807 · DOI
  52. Cupples, 2011, Shifting networks of power in Nicaragua: relational materialisms in the consumption of privatized electricity, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 101, 939, 10.1080/00045608.2011.569654 · DOI
  53. Kokai, 2021, Green design tools: building values and politics into material choices, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 46, 1139, 10.1177/0162243920976840 · DOI
  54. Tironi, 2020, Prototyping public friction: exploring the political effects of design testing in urban space, Br. J. Sociol., 71, 503, 10.1111/1468-4446.12718 · DOI
  55. Renström, 2019, Supporting diverse roles for people in smart energy systems, Energy Res. Social Sci., 53, 98, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.018 · DOI
  56. Renström, 2017, Design for alternative ways of doing - explorations in the context of thermal comfort, J. Des. Res., 15, 153
  57. Tewathia, 2020, Social inequalities, fundamental inequities, and recurring of the digital divide: insights from India, Technol. Soc., 61, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101251 · DOI
  58. Zilian, 2020, Digital inequality in Austria: empirical evidence from the survey of the OECD “programme for the international assessment of adult competencies”, Technol. Soc., 63, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101397 · DOI
  59. Wang, 2022, The Impact of energy poverty on the digital divide: the mediating effect of depression and Internet perception, Technol. Soc., 68, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101884 · DOI
  60. van Deursen, 2019, The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access, New Media Soc., 21, 354, 10.1177/1461444818797082 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Kallio, 2016, Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for aqualitative semi-structured interview guide, J. Adv. Nurs., 72, 2954, 10.1111/jan.13031 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Katzeff, 2017, Smarta elnät - för vem? Översikt och analys av användaraspekter på smarta elnät för bostäder, Rapport No. 23, E2B2
  63. Ryghaug, 2018, Creating energy citizenship through material participation, Soc. Stud. Sci., 48, 283, 10.1177/0306312718770286 · DOI
  64. Kahma, 2017, The rejection of innovations? Rethinking technology diffusion and the non-use of smart energy services in Finland, Energy Res. Social Sci., 34, 27, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.024 · DOI
  65. Sovacool, 2017, Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition, Energy Pol., 109, 767, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.037 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Balta-Ozkan, 2014, A comparison of consumer perceptions towards smart homes in the UK, Germany and Italy: reflections for policy and future research, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 26, 1176, 10.1080/09537325.2014.975788 · DOI
  67. Berlin, 2011, Sustainable consumers and the state: exploring how citizens' trust and distrust in institutions spur political consumption, J. Environ. Pol. Plann., 13, 277, 10.1080/09640568.2011.603207 · DOI
  68. von Platten, 2022, Energy poverty in Sweden: using flexibility capital to describe household vulnerability to rising energy prices, Energy Res. Social Sci., 91, 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102746 · DOI
  69. Paetz, 2012, Smart homes as a means to sustainable energy consumption: a study of consumer perceptions, J. Consum. Pol., 35, 23, 10.1007/s10603-011-9177-2 · DOI
  70. Hargreaves, 2010, Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors, Energy Pol., 38, 6111, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.068 · DOI
  71. Lovell, 2019, Scarce data: off‐grid households in Australia, Energy Pol., 129, 502, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Tarasova, E., & Rohracher, H.
ORCID
Rohracher, Harald
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
72
Pages
102185
ISSN
0160-791X
DOI
10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102185
Cited by
32
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review