Cited by 61Technology Adoption and User BehaviourLibrary Collection Development and Digital ResourcesHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Value-based adoption of e-book subscription services: The roles of environmental concerns and reading habits

Hsiao, Kuo-Lun, Chen, Chia-Chen·2017·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.004

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsiao, K.-L., & Chen, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Taichung University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • National Chung Hsing University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Chia-Chen
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
434-448
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2516377054
Cited by
58
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
payment intention, perceived value, environmental concern, reading habits, positive attitude, university students, tablet computers, mobile e-book, digital publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review