CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Artificial Intelligence in EducationAcademic integrity and plagiarismICT Impact and Policies

What do telecommunications policy academics have to fear from GPT-3?

Open access
Howell, Bronwyn E., Potgieter, Petrus H.·2023·Telecommunications Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102576
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102576

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Garcia-Murillo, M. (2011). Local Loop Unbundling and Broadband Penetration: Evidence from the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 257-269.
  2. Jenssen, A., & Koutroumpis, P. (2013). The Impact of Local Loop Unbundling on Broadband Prices in the EU. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4), 291-303.
  3. Valletti, T. (2008). Local Loop Unbundling and Broadband Penetration: Evidence from the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 32(8-9), 551-560.
  4. Valletti, T., & Criscuolo, C. (2009). Local Loop Unbundling and Broadband Penetration: Further Evidence from the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10), 602-612.
  5. alletti, T., & Criscuolo, C. (2010). Local Loop Unbundling and Broadband Speed: Evidence from the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 34(6), 378-386.
  6. Valletti, T., & Criscuolo, C. (2012). Local Loop Unbundling and Broadband Prices: Evidence from the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 36(5), 341-351.
  7. Colombo, C., & Gheno, P. (2013). Local Loop Unbundling and the Take-up of Fiber Optic Broadband in Italy. Telecommunications Policy, 37(7-8), 574-590. (Cited journal issue does not exist -there is a 37(8) and 37(6-7), but not 37(7-8) https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/telecommunications-policy/issues)
  8. Gebauer, J., Weimann, J., & Zierahn, U. (2015). Local Loop Unbundling and Investment in Fiber-Optic Broadband. Telecommunications Policy, 39(2), 135-150. (The citation is false -https://www.sciencedirect. com/journal/telecommunications-policy/vol/39/issue/2)
  9. Höffler, F., & Valletti, T. (2010). The effects of local loop unbundling on competition and broadband uptake. The Economic Journal, 120(546), 979-1012. (The citation is false -this issue is a special issue on New
  10. Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T., & Woessmann, L. (2011). Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 505-532.
  11. Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T., & Woessmann, L. (2010). Broadband infrastructure and economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries. The Economic Journal, 120(541), 505-532.
  12. Grembi, V., & Valletti, T. (2008). Local loop unbundling, investment and consumer welfare. Telecom- munications Policy, 32(10-11), 644-655.
  13. Hoernig, S., & Valletti, T. (2006). Local loop unbundling and investment. Telecommunications Policy, 30(3-4), 185-200.
  14. Chen, Y., Ku, Y., & Wang, S. (2019). The Impact of Local Loop Unbundling on Fiber Broadband Investment and Uptake in Taiwan. Telecommunications Policy, 43(7), 718-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019. 05.008 · DOI
  15. Chatterjee, D., & Dutta, S. (2020). Impact of Local Loop Unbundling on Fiber Broadband Investment and Uptake in India. Telecommunications Policy, 44(4), 1020-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.10 .013 References · DOI
  16. Ford, G., Lehr, W., & Mitchell, B. (2007). The impact of unbundling rules on the deployment of fiber-optic broadband. Telecommunications Policy, 31(2), 97-116.
  17. Koutroumpis, P., & Papapetrou, E. (2015). The impact of unbundling regulation on the investment in fiber networks. Telecommunications Policy, 39(1-2), 58-76.
  18. Koutroumpis, P., Lehr, W., & Mitchell, B. (2011). The impact of unbundling regulation on the investment in fiber networks. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3-4), 167-184.
  19. Spiliopoulou, G., Koutroumpis, P., & Lehr, W. (2014). The impact of unbundling regulation on the deployment of fiber-optic broadband: A cross-country analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), 301-318.
  20. Economides, N. and Hermalin, B. (2005). Access Regulation and Local Loop Investment. American Economic Review, 95(3), pp.737-752.
  21. Lehr, W. and MacKie-Mason, J. (2006). The Economics of Unbundled Access Regulation: Perverse Incentives and the Need for New Institutions. Journal of Law & Economics, 49(2), pp.631-677.
  22. van Schewick, B. (2008). Access Regulation and Investment Incentives in the European Telecommunications Market. Telecommunications Policy, 32(5-6), pp.279-295.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Howell, B. E., & Potgieter, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Potgieter, Petrus H.
ORCID
Venue
Telecommunications Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
102576
ISSN
0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102576
OpenAlex
W4378192638
Cited by
22
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
Keywords
GPT-3, ChatGPT, large language models, academic integrity, student assessment, AI-generated text, local loop unbundling, access regulation, broadband investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review