Cited by 131Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Will artificial intelligence drive the advancements in higher education? A tri-phased exploration

Kumar, Satish, Rao, Purnima, Singhania, Shubham, Verma, Shubhangi, Kheterpal, Myra·2024·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123258

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, S., Rao, P., Singhania, S., Verma, S., & Kheterpal, M.
Affiliations
  • Delhi Technological University (IN)
  • Fortune Institute of International Business (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Satish
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
201
Pages
123258
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391707386
Cited by
131
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 18
FWCI
49.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
generative AI, ChatGPT, higher education, business education, artificial intelligence in education, academic integrity, plagiarism, social skills, educational innovation, teaching-learning-assessment, AI implementation challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review