The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition
Abstract
Probabilistic methods are providing new explanatory approaches to fundamental cognitive science questions of how humans structure, process and acquire language. This review examines probabilistic models defined over traditional symbolic structures. Language comprehension and production involve probabilistic inference in such models; and acquisition involves choosing the best model, given innate constraints and linguistic and other input. Probabilistic models can account for the learning and processing of language, while maintaining the sophistication of symbolic models. A recent burgeoning of theoretical developments and online corpus creation has enabled large models to be tested, revealing probabilistic constraints in processing, undermining acquisition arguments based on a perceived poverty of the stimulus, and suggesting fruitful links with probabilistic theories of categorization and ambiguity resolution in perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bayesian models of cognition have primarily flourished as explanations of the complex dependency of behavior on the environment in domains including intuitive physics, causal learning, perception, motor control, and language [1-10]”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Language interpretation is a high-level cognitive task which shows a good correspondence to Bayesian models [5,6].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
Self-citationLectures on Government and Binding
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,587
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Williams, E. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413646 · Cited by 5,173
Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1385 · Cited by 4,455
Language identification in the limit
Gold, E. M. (1967) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(67)91165-5 · Cited by 3,572
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Fanselow, G. et al. eds., Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, Oxford University Press (in press)
- Smolensky, P. and Legendre, G. (2006) The Harmonic Mind (2 Vols), MIT Press
- Gibson, 1994, Triggers. Linguist. Inq., 25, 407
- Pierrehumbert, 2001, Stochastic phonology, Glot Intl., 5, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–414 of 414
Objectifying the Subjective: Cognitive Biases in Topic Interpretations
Hingmire, S., Li, Z. S., Zeng, S. (., Awon, A. M., Guerra, L. F., & Ernst, N. (2025) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl.a.50
Commentary/Jones & Love: Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment?
Holyoaka, K. J., & Lua, H. (2011)
Isolated White Frames in Fiction Films: Analysis and Functional Characterization
Aznar, J. S., & Caballero-Molina, J. J. (2026) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374261426245
On the role of deduction in reasoning from uncertain premises
Loebell, N. C. D. E. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5a7691fdz7182z49dcz8bd1z587b00eaabdb
Functional and structural brain adaptations to changing and uncertain environments in humans
Romand-Monnier, M. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7d79d3bez9f17z4c88z8b47z69ffbb1c1c92
Ragni, M. (2026) · doi:10.1515/9783111386690-027
The Dynamics of Psycholinguistics Development: Theoretical and Applied Aspects
Biliavska, Y., Osetskyi, V., Biliavskyi, V., & Umantsiv, Y. (2026) · PSYCHOLINGUISTICS · doi:10.31470/2309-1797-2026-39-1-64-92
Levels of analysis for large language models
Ku, A. Y., Campbell, D., Bai, X., Geng, J., Liu, R., Marjieh, R., McCoy, R. T., Nam, A., Sucholutsky, I., Zhang, L., et al. (2026) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2025.0012 · Cited by 25
Information conveyed in picture descriptions in Alzheimer’s disease: how much and when?
Yuan, M., & Gahl, S. (2026) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2026.2669566
Cross-Modal Probabilistic Representation Learning for Conversational Emotion Recognition
Zhou, Z., Feng, X., Wang, W., & Chen, J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2026.3711930
Semantic Surprise and Semantic Congruence as Antecedents of Legitimacy
Durand, R., & Gouvard, P. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20260000104005
Koushik, M. B., Sri, G. H., Khan, P. S., Nikhilesh, A., & Alam, J. (2026) · International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI) · doi:10.1109/icetci71772.2026.11710648
Processing long-distance dependencies
Leal, T. (2014) · doi:10.17077/etd.4ao82dwf
Metadata
- Authors
- Chater, N., & Manning, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Manning, Christopher D.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 335-344
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162693531
- Semantic Scholar
- c351bcc20d0da75f23daaf20846cad0b93c4f36b
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- probabilistic models, language acquisition, language comprehension, language production, probabilistic inference, symbolic models, poverty of the stimulus, ambiguity resolution, categorization, online corpora
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Concept Formation, Humans, Language Development, Phonetics, Probability Theory, Psycholinguistics, Reading, Semantics, Speech Perception, Models, Statistical, Comprehension, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
