The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition
Abstract
Probabilistic methods are providing new explanatory approaches to fundamental cognitive science questions of how humans structure, process and acquire language. This review examines probabilistic models defined over traditional symbolic structures. Language comprehension and production involve probabilistic inference in such models; and acquisition involves choosing the best model, given innate constraints and linguistic and other input. Probabilistic models can account for the learning and processing of language, while maintaining the sophistication of symbolic models. A recent burgeoning of theoretical developments and online corpus creation has enabled large models to be tested, revealing probabilistic constraints in processing, undermining acquisition arguments based on a perceived poverty of the stimulus, and suggesting fruitful links with probabilistic theories of categorization and ambiguity resolution in perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bayesian models of cognition have primarily flourished as explanations of the complex dependency of behavior on the environment in domains including intuitive physics, causal learning, perception, motor control, and language [1-10]”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Language interpretation is a high-level cognitive task which shows a good correspondence to Bayesian models [5,6].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
Self-citationLectures on Government and Binding
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,587
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Williams, E. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413646 · Cited by 5,173
Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1385 · Cited by 4,455
Language identification in the limit
Gold, E. M. (1967) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(67)91165-5 · Cited by 3,572
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Fanselow, G. et al. eds., Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, Oxford University Press (in press)
- Smolensky, P. and Legendre, G. (2006) The Harmonic Mind (2 Vols), MIT Press
- Gibson, 1994, Triggers. Linguist. Inq., 25, 407
- Pierrehumbert, 2001, Stochastic phonology, Glot Intl., 5, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2 · Cited by 1,134
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 · Cited by 1,087
Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language
Friedemann Pulvermüller, A., & Fadiga, L. (2010) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2811 · Cited by 1,105
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 · Cited by 880
Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis?
Yuille, A., & Kersten, D. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.002 · Cited by 849
The propositional nature of human associative learning
Mitchell, C. J., Houwer, J. D., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09000855 · Cited by 789
A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain
Kiebel, S. J., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000209 · Cited by 694
Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations
Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Yuille, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007 · Cited by 573
Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816772.006 · Cited by 529
Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species
Sagarin, R. D., Gaines, S. D., & Gaylord, B. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.008 · Cited by 508
Vul (2014) · doi:10.1111/cogs.12101 · Cited by 502
Theory-based causal induction.
Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0017201 · Cited by 401
Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09000284 · Cited by 350
Siew, C. S. Q., Wulff, D. U., Beckage, N., & Kenett, Y. N. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/2108423 · Cited by 351
Bayesian Brains without Probabilities
Sanborn, A. N., & Chater, N. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.003 · Cited by 307
Ellis, N. C. (2008) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00716.x · Cited by 315
The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. (2007) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e3281139ed0 · Cited by 291
The learnability of abstract syntactic principles
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier, T. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.001 · Cited by 303
Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults
Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.x · Cited by 301
On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism
Gigerenzer, G. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1 · Cited by 247
Early Anticipation Lies behind the Speed of Response in Conversation
Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., de Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00673 · Cited by 247
Grammaticality, Acceptability, and Probability: A Probabilistic View of Linguistic Knowledge
Lau, J. H., Clark, A., & Lappin, S. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12414 · Cited by 262
Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency
Lieven, E. (2010) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005 · Cited by 245
Becker, M., Ketrez, F. N., & Nevins, A. I. (2011) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2011.0016 · Cited by 227
Fitch, W. T. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.005 · Cited by 231
Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview
Fitch, W. T., & Friederici, A. D. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0103 · Cited by 212
Comprehensible Predictive Models for Business Processes1
Breuker, D., Matzner, M., Delfmann, P., & Becker, J. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.4.10 · Cited by 190
Information‐theoretical Complexity Metrics
Hale, J. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12196 · Cited by 186
Pulvermüller, F. (2010) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.002 · Cited by 182
Solway, A., & Botvinick, M. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0026435 · Cited by 194
Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.54.03wul · Cited by 84
The Centrality of Metrical Structure in Signaling Information Structure: A Probabilistic Perspective
Calhoun, S. (2010) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.0.0197 · Cited by 176
Human Sensorimotor Communication: A Theory of Signaling in Online Social Interactions
Pezzulo, G., Donnarumma, F., & Dindo, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079876 · Cited by 187
Tools from evolutionary biology shed new light on the diversification of languages
Levinson, S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.007 · Cited by 174
The Role of L1 Transfer in the Interpretation of Articles with Definite Plurals in L2 English
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00577.x · Cited by 178
Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00937.x · Cited by 187
What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross‐situational word learning
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00958.x · Cited by 161
AN EMERGENTIST PERSPECTIVE ON HERITAGE LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
O'Grady, W. D., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, O.-S., & Lee, M. (2011) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263110000744 · Cited by 150
Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use
Kristensen, L. B., & Wallentin, M. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107323667 · Cited by 142
Optimizing the Input: Frequency and Sampling in Usage‐Based and Form‐Focused Learning
Ellis, N. C. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444315783.ch9 · Cited by 131
Chater, N., Oaksford, M., Hahn, U., & Heit, E. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.79 · Cited by 132
Divjak, D. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.01134-0 · Cited by 135
Bayesian networks, Bayesian learning and cognitive development
Alison Gopnik, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00584.x · Cited by 128
Bayesian intractability is not an ailment that approximation can cure
Kwisthout, J., Wareham, T., & van Rooij, I. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01182.x · Cited by 122
Bayes and Blickets: Effects of Knowledge on Causal Induction in Children and Adults
Griffiths, T. L., Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Alison Gopnik, C. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01203.x · Cited by 116
Harmonic biases in child learners: In support of language universals
Culbertson, J., & Newport, E. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.007 · Cited by 101
Frequency in Language: Memory, Attention and Learning
Divjak, D. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316084410 · Cited by 115
Probabilistic Semantics and Pragmatics Uncertainty in Language and Thought
Goodman, N. D., & Lassiter, D. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118882139.ch21 · Cited by 115
Brown, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00643 · Cited by 115
Composition is the Core Driver of the Language-selective Network
Mollica, F., Diachek, E., Mineroff, Z., Kean, H., Siegelman, M., Piantadosi, S. T., Futrell, R., Qian, P., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2020) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00005 · Cited by 115
O'Grady, W. D. (2007) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.12.001 · Cited by 105
Perception and hierarchical dynamics
Kiebel, S. J. (2009) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/neuro.11.020.2009 · Cited by 106
Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind
Bermúdez, J. L. (2020) · Cited by 98
Faster Teaching via POMDP Planning
Rafferty, A. N., Brunskill, E., Griffiths, T. L., & Shafto, P. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12290 · Cited by 110
The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
Zhu, J.-Q., Sanborn, A. N., & Chater, N. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000190 · Cited by 95
Exploring social-indexical knowledge: A long past but a short history
Foulkes, P. (2010) · Laboratory Phonology · doi:10.1515/labphon.2010.003 · Cited by 43
Optimality and heuristics in perceptual neuroscience
Gardner, J. L. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0340-4 · Cited by 94
Learning Abstract Concept Embeddings from Multi-Modal Data: Since You Probably Can't See What I Mean
Hill, F., & Korhonen, A. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1032 · Cited by 88
Koerner, N., Mejia, T., & Kusec, A. (2017) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2016.1211172 · Cited by 81
Faster Teaching by POMDP Planning
Rafferty, A. N., Brunskill, E., Griffiths, T. L., & Shafto, P. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_37 · Cited by 87
Constructing grammar: a computational model of the emergence of early constructions
Feldman, J. A., & Chang, N. (2008) · Cited by 80
Building machines that learn and think with people
Collins, K. M., Sucholutsky, I., Bhatt, U., Chandra, K., Wong, L., Lee, M., Zhang, C. E., Zhi‐Xuan, T., Ho, M. K., Mansinghka, V. K., et al. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01991-9 · Cited by 125
Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks
Hoffrage, U., Krauß, S., Martignon, L. F., & Gigerenzer, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01473 · Cited by 79
Comparisons Inform Me Who I Am: A General Comparative-Processing Model of Self-Perception
Nexhmedin Morina, B. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620966788 · Cited by 79
Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate
Chater, N., Felin, T., Funder, D. C., Gigerenzer, G., Koenderink, J. J., Krueger, J. I., Noble, D., Nordli, S. A., Oaksford, M., Schwartz, B. N., et al. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1333-5 · Cited by 85
Chinese Kindergartners Learn to Read Characters Analytically
Yin, L., & McBride, C. A. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614567203 · Cited by 77
The anchor integration model: A descriptive model of anchoring effects
Turner, B. M., & Schley, D. R. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.07.003 · Cited by 76
A Probabilistic Model of Semantic Plausibility in Sentence Processing
Padó, U., Crocker, M. W., & Keller, F. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01033.x · Cited by 75
The illusion of language acquisition
O'Grady, W. D. (2013) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.3.3.01ogr · Cited by 74
Using Category Structures to Test Iterated Learning as a Method for Identifying Inductive Biases
Griffiths, T. L., Christian, B., & Kalish, M. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701801974 · Cited by 70
Laks, B. (2008) · Journal of French Language Studies · doi:10.1017/s0959269507003146 · Cited by 82
Auclair‐Ouellet, N., LIEBERMAN, P. H., & Monchi, O. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.014 · Cited by 74
Modeling language and cognition with deep unsupervised learning: a tutorial overview
Zorzi, M., Testolin, A., & Stoianov, I. P. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00515 · Cited by 71
9. How recursive is language? A Bayesian exploration
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., Gibson, E. A. F., & Regier, T. (2010) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110219258.159 · Cited by 66
Probabilistic Type Theory and Natural Language Semantics
Cooper, R., Dobnik, S., Lappin, S., & Larsson, S. (2015) · Linguistic Issues in Language Technology · doi:10.33011/lilt.v10i.1357 · Cited by 64
Situated sentence processing: The coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model
Crocker, M. W., Knoeferle, P., & Mayberry, M. R. (2009) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.03.004 · Cited by 71
Three ideal observer models for rule learning in simple languages.
Frank, M. C., & Tenenbaum, J. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.005 · Cited by 64
Rey, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198855637.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Cognitive Biases, Linguistic Universals, and Constraint‐Based Grammar Learning
Culbertson, J., Smolensky, P., & Wilson, C. J. N. (2013) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12027 · Cited by 61
The Emergence of Sociophonetic Structure
Foulkes, P., & Hay, J. B. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118346136.ch13 · Cited by 63
Sociolinguistic interaction and identity construction: The view from game‐theoretic pragmatics
Burnett, H. (2017) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12229 · Cited by 65
What Computational Linguists Can Learn from Psychologists (and Vice Versa)
Krahmer, E. (2010) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2010.36.2.36201 · Cited by 58
Bridging the gap between theory and practice of approximate Bayesian inference
Kwisthout, J., & van Rooij, I. (2013) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.12.008 · Cited by 56
Usage-based approaches to aphasia
Gahl, S., & Menn, L. (2016) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1140120 · Cited by 57
The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?
Hahn, U. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00765 · Cited by 65
Statistical learning is lasting and consistent over time
Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.045 · Cited by 56
Rule-based and word-level statistics-based processing of language: insights from neuroscience
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1215477 · Cited by 54
Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216093.003.0001 · Cited by 53
Why is there variation rather than nothing?
Laks, B. (2013) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2013.02.009 · Cited by 51
Frequency-specific brain dynamics related to prediction during language comprehension
Armeni, K., Willems, R. M., van den Bosch, A. P. J., & Schoffelen, J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.083 · Cited by 45
Subjective Probability as Sampling Propensity
Icard, T. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0283-y · Cited by 54
Connectionist perspectives on language learning, representation and processing
Joanisse, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (2015) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1340 · Cited by 51
Time perception: The surprising effects of surprising stimuli.
Matthews, W. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000041 · Cited by 46
ROBINSON, P., & Ellis, N. C. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203938560-28 · Cited by 49
Learning Words in Space and Time
Spencer, J. P., Perone, S., Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. K. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611413934 · Cited by 42
Probabilistic models of cognition: where next?
Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Yuille, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.008 · Cited by 41
Significance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning
Westover, M. B., Westover, K. D., & Bianchi, M. T. (2011) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-20 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Chater, N., & Manning, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Manning, Christopher D.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 335-344
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162693531
- Semantic Scholar
- c351bcc20d0da75f23daaf20846cad0b93c4f36b
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- probabilistic models, language acquisition, language comprehension, language production, probabilistic inference, symbolic models, poverty of the stimulus, ambiguity resolution, categorization, online corpora
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Concept Formation, Humans, Language Development, Phonetics, Probability Theory, Psycholinguistics, Reading, Semantics, Speech Perception, Models, Statistical, Comprehension, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review