Cited by 596Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceSleep and related disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 47 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology

Open access
Nir, Yuval, Tononi, Giulio·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Dreams are a most remarkable experiment in psychology and neuroscience, conducted every night in every sleeping person. They show that our brain, disconnected from the environment, can generate by itself an entire world of conscious experiences. Content analysis and developmental studies have furthered our understanding of dream phenomenology. In parallel, brain lesion studies, functional imaging, and neurophysiology have advanced our knowledge of the neural basis of dreaming. It is now possible to start integrating these two strands of research in order to address some fundamental questions that dreams pose for cognitive neuroscience: how conscious experiences in sleep relate to underlying brain activity; why the dreamer is largely disconnected from the environment; and whether dreaming is more closely related to mental imagery or to perception.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.001

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 25 claims

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 176 references

9 of the 176 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hartmann, 1968, The day residue: time distribution of waking events, Psychophysiology, 5, 222
  2. Doricchi, 1992, Dream recall in brain-damaged patients: A contribution to the neuropsychology of dreaming through a review of the literature, 99

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 596

Metadata

Authors
Nir, Y., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
88-100
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081767153
Cited by
595
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20mh077967-04, DP1OD000579)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH-077967)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
dreams, phenomenology of dreams, brain lesions, functional imaging, mental imagery, perception, sleep
MeSH terms
Brain, Consciousness, Dreams, Emotions, Environment, Humans, Imagination, Neurophysiology, Perception, Psychophysiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-26 (prompt extract-v2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review