Cited by 21Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceSleep and related disorders

Dreaming and waking cognition.

Graveline, Yvette M., Wamsley, Erin J.·2015·Translational Issues in Psychological Science

Abstract

Dreams are often believed to be “symbolic” and thus categorically distinct from the “ordinary” thoughts of waking cognition. But to the contrary, emerging evidence suggests that dreams and waking cognition share a common origin at the neurobiological level, which is reflected in similarity of form, content, and function at the phenomenological level. In both dreams and daydreams, memories of the past form the basis of novel imaginary scenarios. Neural networks that support remembering the past, imagining the future, and creating fictitious scenes remain active across conscious states of wake and sleep. Taken together, this evidence suggests that dreaming is a natural extension of waking conscious experience. This empirically supported conception of dreaming has important clinical applications concerning the “interpretability” of dreams in the therapeutic setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tps0000018

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, recent evidence shows that mental time travel and dreaming may be generated through similar networks in the brain, share parallels in their (re)constructive processes, and share deficits owing to injury and disease.

    “In humans, recent evidence shows that mental time travel and dreaming may be generated through similar networks in the brain [194,195], share parallels in their (re)constructive processes [196–199] as well as deficits owing to injury and disease [200,201].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [195]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graveline, Y. M., & Wamsley, E. J.
Venue
Translational Issues in Psychological Science
Published
2015-03
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
97-105
ISSN
  • 2332-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-2179
OpenAlex
W2149179569
Cited by
21
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Translational Issues in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
dreams, daydreaming, memory, imagination, artificial neural networks, sleep, subjective experience, dream interpretation, therapeutic use of dreams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review