The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases
Abstract
Cognitive science aims to reverse-engineer the mind, and many of the engineering challenges the mind faces involve induction. The probabilistic approach to modeling cognition begins by identifying ideal solutions to these inductive problems. Mental processes are then modeled using algorithms for approximating these solutions, and neural processes are viewed as mechanisms for implementing these algorithms, with the result being a top-down analysis of cognition starting with the function of cognitive processes. Typical connectionist models, by contrast, follow a bottom-up approach, beginning with a characterization of neural mechanisms and exploring what macro-level functional phenomena might emerge. We argue that the top-down approach yields greater flexibility for exploring the representations and inductive biases that underlie human cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One success story is that of Bayesian cognitive models, which optimally combine prior knowledge about the world with sensory evidence21–23.”
From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“By declaring their models independent of the implementation in the brain, cognitive scientists are able to address high-level cognitive processes21,97,98 that are beyond the reach of current neural networks.”
From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Causation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2748-9 · Cited by 4,617
Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks
Neal, R. M. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0 · Cited by 4,276
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · Cited by 4,022
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 569
Quantum probability updating from zero prior (by-passing Cromwell's rule)Preprint
Basieva, I., Pothos, E. M., Trueblood, J. S., Khrennikov, A. Y., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08128 · Cited by 7
Boyce-Jacino, C., & DeDeo, S. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5mgn2 · Cited by 7
How to grow a self: development of self-representation in the Bayesian brain
Wozniak, M. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1441931 · Cited by 15
Unterhuber, M., & Schurz, G. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0159-y · Cited by 6
The Future Is Computational Comparative Cognition
Voudouris, K., Cheke, L. G., & Halina, M. (2024) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2024.190009 · Cited by 6
Colantonio, J. A., Bascandziev, I., Theobald, M., Brod, G., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2024) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12749 · Cited by 8
How rational inference about authority debunking can curtail, sustain, or spread belief polarization
Radkani, S., Landau-Wells, M., & Saxe, R. R. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae393 · Cited by 6
Bridging levels of analysis: comment on McClelland et al. and Griffiths et al.
Kruschke, J. K. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.007 · Cited by 6
Cowell, R. A., Bussey, T. J., & Saksida, L. M. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.008 · Cited by 6
Hierarchical Bayesian models of cognitive development
Glassen, T., & Nitsch, V. (2016) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-016-0686-6 · Cited by 6
Problems and Possibilities for Empirically Informed Philosophy of Mind
Irvine, E. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137286734_9 · Cited by 6
Millroth, P. (2021) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100873 · Cited by 6
More Causes Less Effect: Destructive Interference in Decision Making
Basieva, I., Pandey, V., & Khrennikova, P. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24050725 · Cited by 7
Hardy, M. D., Krafft, P. M., Thompson, B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2022) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12596 · Cited by 5
Self-citationNeither size fits all: comment on McClelland et al. and Griffiths et al.
Marcus, G. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.010 · Cited by 6
Model-Based Theorizing in Cognitive Neuroscience
Irvine, E. (2014) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axu034 · Cited by 6
How does Bayesian reverse-engineering work?
Zednik, C., & Jäkel, F. (2025) · Technischen Universität Darmstadt · doi:10.26083/tuprints-00029995 · Cited by 8
A quantum probability perspective on the nature of psychological uncertainty
White, L. C., Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
The Emergence of Systematicity in Minimally Cognitive Agents
Calvo, P., Martin, E. J., & Symons, J. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027236.003.0016 · Cited by 6
Rupert, R. D. (2019) · Avant · doi:10.26913/avant.2019.03.08 · Cited by 6
Minimizing Relative Entropy in Hierarchical Predictive Coding
Kwisthout, J. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11433-0_17 · Cited by 6
Indispensability of Computational Modeling in Cognitive Science
Farkaš, I. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Science · doi:10.17791/jcs.2012.13.4.401 · Cited by 6
Laszlo, S., & Armstrong, B. C. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Cognitive Science should be unified: comment on Griffiths et al. and McClelland et al.
Feldman, J. A. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.008 · Cited by 6
Deep Learning: Implications for Human Learning and MemoryPreprint
McClelland, J. L., & Botvinick, M. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3m5sb · Cited by 6
Understanding the Roles of Type and Token Frequency in Usage‐Based linguistics
Kapatsinski, V. M. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119839859.ch5 · Cited by 5
Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer
Lin, C., Do, T. T., Unsworth, L., & Garrido, M. I. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011769 · Cited by 6
Zheng, J., Li, Z., Xu, T., & Song, R. (2024) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202400505 · Cited by 5
Usage-based Grammar Induction from Minimal Cognitive Principles
Jon-And, A., & Michaud, J. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00528 · Cited by 6
Quantum modeling of common sense
Noori, H. R., & Spanagel, R. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1200307x · Cited by 5
Lee, M. D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.011 · Cited by 5
Instance-based generalization for human judgments about uncertainty
Schustek, P., & Moreno‐Bote, R. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006205 · Cited by 9
Expanding and Repositioning Cognitive Science
Rosenbloom, P. S., & Forbus, K. D. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12468 · Cited by 5
Bayesian Modelling of Alluvial Diagram Complexity
Arunkumar, A., Ginjpalli, S., & Bryan, C. (2021) · Visualization · doi:10.1109/vis49827.2021.9623282 · Cited by 5
Bayesian Analysis in Natural Language Processing
Cohen, S. B. (2016) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00719ed1v01y201605hlt035 · Cited by 5
Sensitivity to Context in Human Interactions
Waddup, O. J., Błasiak, P., Yearsley, J. M., Wojciechowski, B. W., & Pothos, E. M. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9212784 · Cited by 5
Altmann, G. T. M. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.013 · Cited by 5
Perception in a Variable but Structured World: The Case of Speech PerceptionPreprint
Kleinschmidt, D. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/zwves · Cited by 5
Development of conscious knowledge during early incidental learning of L2 syntax
Hamrick, P. (2013) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 6
Flexible Conceptual Representations
Truman, A., & Marta Kutas, A. (2024) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13475 · Cited by 4
Causal representation learning through higher-level information extraction
Silva, F., Oliveira, H. P., & Pereira, T. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3696412 · Cited by 5
Relationships and representations of brain structures, connectivity, dynamics and functions
Schmitt, O. (2025) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111332 · Cited by 5
Cognitive Systems, Predictive Processing, and the Self
Rupert, R. D. (2021) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00577-y · Cited by 4
Adaptive curiosity about metacognitive ability.
Recht, S., Li, C., Yang, Y., & Chiu, K. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001690 · Cited by 5
Zheng, F., Qu, S., Li, Z., Li, Q., Shi, P. J., Sun, Y., Yang, X., Tang, H., Zhang, J., Zhu, Z., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133562 · Cited by 4
The evolution of linguistic rules
Spike, M. (2017) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-018-9610-x · Cited by 4
How well do rudimentary plasticity rules predict adult visual object learning?
Lee, M. J., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011713 · Cited by 4
Spontaneous biases enhance generalization in the neonate brain
Wang, S., Vasas, V., Freeland, L. V., Osorio, D., & Versace, E. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110195 · Cited by 4
A neural model that implements probabilistic topics
Cabana, Á., Mizraji, E., & Valle-Lisboa, J. C. (2015) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.061 · Cited by 4
Further attempts to clarify the importance of category variability for categorisation
Perlman, A., Hahn, U., Edwards, D. J., & Pothos, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.613818 · Cited by 4
Solo Based-Cognition Levels of Inductive Reasoning in Geometry
Gagani, R. F. M., & Misa, R. O. (2018) · Alberta Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v63i4.56331 · Cited by 4
Keeping Bayesian models rational: The need for an account of algorithmic rationality
Danks, D. J., & Eberhardt, F. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000240 · Cited by 4
Kersting, N., Smith, J. E., Vezino, B., Chen, M.-K., Wood, M., & Stigler, J. (2020) · Zdm · doi:10.1007/s11858-020-01135-z · Cited by 6
Extensional Superposition and Its Relation to Compositionality in Language and Thought
Thornton, C. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12929 · Cited by 4
Powering up causal generalization: A model of human conceptual bootstrapping with adaptor grammarsPreprint
Zhao, B., Bramley, N. R., & Lucas, C. G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7gvx9 · Cited by 4
A természettudományos nevelés fő kutatási irányzatai Trends in Science Education Research
Korom, E., & Orosz, G. Z. (2020) · Magyar Tudomány · doi:10.1556/2065.181.2020.1.4 · Cited by 3
Learning from conditional probabilities
Strößner, C., & Hahn, U. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105962 · Cited by 3
Language Universals in Sentence Length: Comparing Sentence Length Distributions of 10 Languages
Zhou, Y., Jiang, J., & Liu, H. (2025) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70115 · Cited by 3
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Subgrid-Scale Flame Wrinkling Modeling
Xing, V., & Lapeyre, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16248-0_6 · Cited by 5
Probabilistic programming versus meta-learning as models of cognition
Ong, D. C., Zhi‐Xuan, T., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Goodman, N. D. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24000153 · Cited by 3
Self-citationFractal Unfolding: A Metamorphic Approach to Learning to Parse Recursive Structure
Tabor, W., Cho, P. W., & Szkudlarek, E. (2012) · Cited by 3
Systematicity and the Need for Encapsulated Representations
Borensztajn, G., Zuidema, W. H., & Bechtel, W. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027236.003.0007 · Cited by 4
Maguire, P., Moser, P., Maguire, R., & Keane, M. T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01011 · Cited by 3
Moghaddam, R. F., & Cheriet, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2197013 · Cited by 3
Comparing the inductive biases of simple neural networks and Bayesian models
Griffiths, T. L., Austerweil, J. L., & Berthiaume, V. G. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Self-citationSimilarity Judgments: From Classical to Complex Vector Psychological Spaces
Duran, A. B., Pothos, E. M., Yearsley, J. M., Hampton, J. A., Busemeyer, J. R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2015) · Advanced series on mathematical psychology · doi:10.1142/9789814730617_0019 · Cited by 3
Visual recency bias is explained by a mixture model of internal representationsPreprint
Kalm, K., & Norris, D. G. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/228973 · Cited by 3
A Quantum Geometric Framework for Modeling Color Similarity JudgementsPreprint
Epping, G. P., Fisher, E. L., Zeleznikow-Johnston, A., Pothos, E. M., & Tsuchiya, N. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vtzrq · Cited by 3
Testing one or multiple: How beliefs about sparsity affect causal experimentationPreprint
Coenen, A., Ruggeri, A., Bramley, N. R., & Gureckis, T. M. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zd4jp · Cited by 3
Deep Latent Factor Model for Spatio-Temporal Forecasting
Koo, W., Ma, E.-Y., & Kim, H. (2024) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2024.2322661 · Cited by 5
Bayes beyond the predictive distribution
Székely, A., & Orbán, G. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24000086 · Cited by 2
Fang, Z., Qu, S., Yang, X., Li, Z., Shi, P., Xu, X., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-91219-1 · Cited by 2
Learning unified patterns of multimodalities for video temporal grounding
Yang, J., & Wei, P. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.112484 · Cited by 2
Bayesian computation and mechanism: Theoretical pluralism drives scientific emergence
Sewell, D. K., Little, D. R., & Lewandowsky, S. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000392 · Cited by 2
Computational Neuroscience Models and Tools: A Review
Kaur, P., & Gaba, G. S. (2020) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5495-7_22 · Cited by 2
Recognizing why vision is inferential
Ritchie, J. B. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03508-1 · Cited by 2
To What Extent Is General Intelligence Relevant to Causal Reasoning? A Developmental Study
Dündar‐Coecke, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.692552 · Cited by 3
A Schema-Based Robot Controller Complying With the Constraints of Biological Systems
Lagriffoul, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2022.836767 · Cited by 3
Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
Вадимович, Т. Р., & DeDeo, S. (2023) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00112 · Cited by 2
McClelland, J. L., & Botvinick, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.8 · Cited by 2
Identifying Transfer Learning in the Reshaping of Inductive Biases
Székely, A., Török, B., Kiss, M. M., Janacsek, K., Németh, D., & Orbán, G. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00158 · Cited by 4
An Aha moment precedes the strategic response to a visuomotor rotation
Townsend, M., Warburton, M., Campagnoli, C., Mon-Williams, M. A., Mushtaq, F., & Morehead, J. R. (2026) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.04.021 · Cited by 2
The state of hybrid artificial intelligence for interstellar missions
Ellery, A. A. (2025) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2025.101100 · Cited by 2
Koyama, T. (2018) · The Japanese Journal of Special Education · doi:10.6033/tokkyou.56.95 · Cited by 2
Causal Models and Cognitive Development
Alison Gopnik, C. (2022) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3501714.3501746 · Cited by 2
Gesture processing as grounded motor cognition: Towards a computational model
Sadeghipour, A., & Kopp, S. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.032 · Cited by 2
Newcombe, N. S. (2011) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00198.x · Cited by 2
Designing neural networks that process mean values of random variables
Barber, M. J., & Clark, J. W. (2014) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.04.065 · Cited by 2
Comparison of Effects of Different Learning Methods on Estimation of Distribution Algorithms
Ding, C., Ding, L., & Peng, W. (2015) · Journal of Software Engineering · doi:10.3923/jse.2015.451.468 · Cited by 2
Identifying the Meta-Forms of Situations
Neuman, Y., Cohen, Y., Assaf, D., & Danesi, M. (2017) · International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric · doi:10.4018/ijsvr.2017010107 · Cited by 2
Bayesian Analysis in Natural Language Processing, Second Edition
Cohen, S. B. (2019) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00905ed2v01y201903hlt041 · Cited by 3
Belief Decay or Persistence? A Mixed‐method Study on Belief Movement Over Time
Gupta, S., Karduni, A., & Wall, E. (2023) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.14816 · Cited by 2
Nudging and boosting financial decisions
Hertwig, R., & Grüne‐Yanoff, T. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 2
A challenge for predictive coding: Representational or experiential diversity?
Vilas, M. G., & Melloni, L. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19003157 · Cited by 2
A Computational Theory of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy from the “Bayesian Brain” PerspectivePreprint
Manjaly, Z., & Iglesias, S. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qu5gb · Cited by 2
The ecology of competition: A theory of risk-reward environments in adaptive decision makingPreprint
Pleskac, T. J., Conradt, L., Leuker, C., & Hertwig, R. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ewzcb · Cited by 2
Higher Cognition: A Mechanical Perspective
Friedman, R. (2022) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia2030102 · Cited by 2
Abstract deliberation by visuomotor neurons in prefrontal cortexPreprint
Charlton, J. A., & Goris, R. L. T. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.06.519340 · Cited by 2
Huang, J. A., Busemeyer, J. R., Pothos, E. M., & Ebelt, Z. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/udz27 · Cited by 2
Closed-Loop Scientific Discovery in the Behavioral SciencesPreprint
Musslick, S., Strittmatter, Y., & Dubova, M. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c2ytb · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, Thomas L.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 357-364
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167956961
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- inductive bias, mental representation, top-down modeling, connectionist models, neural mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Humans, Models, Psychological, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
