The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases
Abstract
Cognitive science aims to reverse-engineer the mind, and many of the engineering challenges the mind faces involve induction. The probabilistic approach to modeling cognition begins by identifying ideal solutions to these inductive problems. Mental processes are then modeled using algorithms for approximating these solutions, and neural processes are viewed as mechanisms for implementing these algorithms, with the result being a top-down analysis of cognition starting with the function of cognitive processes. Typical connectionist models, by contrast, follow a bottom-up approach, beginning with a characterization of neural mechanisms and exploring what macro-level functional phenomena might emerge. We argue that the top-down approach yields greater flexibility for exploring the representations and inductive biases that underlie human cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One success story is that of Bayesian cognitive models, which optimally combine prior knowledge about the world with sensory evidence21–23.”
From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“By declaring their models independent of the implementation in the brain, cognitive scientists are able to address high-level cognitive processes21,97,98 that are beyond the reach of current neural networks.”
From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Causation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2748-9 · Cited by 4,617
Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks
Neal, R. M. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0 · Cited by 4,276
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · Cited by 4,022
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
Self-citationHow to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Self-citationWhat do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 · Cited by 1,087
Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1900061x · Cited by 892
Self-citationNudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions
Hertwig, R., & Grüne‐Yanoff, T. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617702496 · Cited by 902
Reinforcement learning, fast and slow
Botvinick, M., Ritter, S., Wang, J. X., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Blundell, C., & Hassabis, D. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.006 · Cited by 667
Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory.
Alison Gopnik, C., & Wellman, H. M. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028044 · Cited by 660
Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.
Kleinschmidt, D., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0038695 · Cited by 684
Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
Cognitive computational neuroscience
Kriegeskorte, N., & Douglas, P. K. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0210-5 · Cited by 535
Reinforcement learning and episodic memory in humans and animals: an integrative framework
Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033625 · Cited by 446
Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition
McClelland, J. L., Botvinick, M. M., Noelle, D. C., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., & Smith, L. B. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002 · Cited by 305
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001525 · Cited by 475
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.
Bowers, J. S., & Davis, C. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0026450 · Cited by 436
Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F., & Goodman, N. D. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12142 · Cited by 434
Self-citationRapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077661 · Cited by 395
Learning task-state representations
Niv, Y. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0470-8 · Cited by 356
Hybrid-augmented intelligence: collaboration and cognition
Zheng, N., Liu, Z., Ren, P., Ma, Y., Chen, S., Yu, S., Xue, J., Chen, B., & Wang, F. (2017) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1700053 · Cited by 421
A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation
Petzschner, F. H., Glasauer, S., & Stephan, K. E. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.002 · Cited by 327
van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620970604 · Cited by 377
The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology
Jara‐Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.011 · Cited by 367
Self-citationAlison Gopnik, C., O’Grady, S., Lucas, C. G., Griffiths, T. L., Wente, A., Bridgers, S., Aboody, R., Fung, H., & Dahl, R. E. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700811114 · Cited by 355
Self-citationSiew, C. S. Q., Wulff, D. U., Beckage, N., & Kenett, Y. N. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/2108423 · Cited by 351
A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Xu, F. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.015 · Cited by 300
Self-citationThe developing infant creates a curriculum for statistical learning
Smith, L. B., Jayaraman, S., Clerkin, E. M., & Chen, Y. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.004 · Cited by 259
A generative vision model that trains with high data efficiency and breaks text-based CAPTCHAs
George, D., Lehrach, W. P., Kansky, K., Lázaro-Gredilla, M., Laan, C., Marthi, B., Lou, X., Meng, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2612 · Cited by 289
Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: Further Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition
Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12148 · Cited by 243
The Conceptual mind: new directions in the study of concepts
Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2016) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.193092 · Cited by 234
Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network
Lake, B. M., & Baroni, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06668-3 · Cited by 230
Event-driven contrastive divergence for spiking neuromorphic systems
Neftci, E., Das, S., Pedroni, B. U., Kreutz-Delgado, K., & Cauwenberghs, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00272 · Cited by 215
Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612 · Cited by 229
Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Montoro, P. R. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037527 · Cited by 204
The power of possibility: causal learning, counterfactual reasoning, and pretend play
Buchsbaum, D., Bridgers, S., Skolnick Weisberg, D., & Gopnik, A. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0122 · Cited by 200
Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Norris, D., & Pouget, A. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0026884 · Cited by 192
Self-citationThe Neuroscience of Learning: Beyond the Hebbian Synapse
Gallistel, C. R., & Matzel, L. D. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143807 · Cited by 212
Making better decisions in groups
Bang, D., & Frith, C. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170193 · Cited by 210
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-123501 · Cited by 223
Modelling trial-by-trial changes in the mismatch negativity
Lieder, F., Daunizeau, J., Garrido, M. I., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002911 · Cited by 168
Organizing probabilistic models of perception
Ma, W. J. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.010 · Cited by 169
Bayes in the Brain—On Bayesian Modelling in Neuroscience
Colombo, M., & Seriès, P. (2012) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axr043 · Cited by 164
Précis of The Origin of Concepts
Carey, S. E. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000919 · Cited by 180
Bridging Levels of Analysis for Probabilistic Models of Cognition
Griffiths, T. L., Vul, E., & Sanborn, A. N. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412447619 · Cited by 159
Self-citationTheory Is All You Need: AI, Human Cognition, and Causal Reasoning
(2024) · doi:10.1287/stsc.2024.0189 · Cited by 151
Integration and Prediction in Language Processing: A Synthesis of Old and New
Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418794491 · Cited by 144
Culture shapes the evolution of cognition
Thompson, B., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1523631113 · Cited by 144
A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency
Douven, I. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1344-2 · Cited by 182
Abstract representations emerge in human hippocampal neurons during inference
Courellis, H. S., Minxha, J., Cardenas, A. R., Kimmel, D. L., Reed, C. M., Valiante, T. A., Salzman, C. D., Mamelak, A. N., Fusi, S., & Rutishauser, U. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07799-x · Cited by 163
Above and beyond the concrete: The diverse representational substrates of the predictive brain
Gilead, M., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2019) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19002000 · Cited by 136
Models of visual word recognition
Norris, D. G. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003 · Cited by 134
Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: A simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference
Bonawitz, E. B., Denison, S., Alison Gopnik, C., & Griffiths, T. L. (2014) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003 · Cited by 141
Self-citationGeneralizing beyond the input: The functions of the constructions matter
Perek, F., & Goldberg, A. E. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.006 · Cited by 129
Bayesian learning for rapid prediction of lithium-ion battery-cycling protocols
Jiang, B., Gent, W. E., Mohr, F., Das, S., Berliner, M. D., Forsuelo, M. A., Zhao, H., Attia, P. M., Grover, A., Herring, P. K., et al. (2021) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.10.010 · Cited by 129
Infants are rational constructivist learners
Xu, F., & Kushnir, T. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412469396 · Cited by 119
Fields, C., & Levin, M. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24060819 · Cited by 121
Structure learning and the Occam's razor principle: a new view of human function acquisition
Narain, D., Smeets, J. B. J., Mamassian, P., Brenner, E., & van Beers, R. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00121 · Cited by 117
Economic Choice as an Untangling of Options into Actions
Yoo, S. B. M., & Hayden, B. Y. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.038 · Cited by 110
Brown, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00643 · Cited by 115
The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
Swanson, L. R. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2016.00079 · Cited by 118
Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners
Wonnacott, E. (2011) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.001 · Cited by 86
A quantum geometric model of similarity.
Pothos, E. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0033142 · Cited by 105
Colombo, M., & Piccinini, G. (2023) · doi:10.1017/9781009183734 · Cited by 106
Quantum probability in decision making from quantum information representation of neuronal states
Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I., Pothos, E. M., & Yamato, I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34531-3 · Cited by 93
Novelty and Inductive Generalization in Human Reinforcement Learning
Gershman, S. J., & Niv, Y. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12138 · Cited by 99
Faster Teaching via POMDP Planning
Rafferty, A. N., Brunskill, E., Griffiths, T. L., & Shafto, P. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12290 · Cited by 110
Self-citationBechtel, W., & Shagrir, O. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12141 · Cited by 96
Replay and compositional computation
Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., Behrens, T. E. J., Wayne, G., Miller, K. J., Luettgau, L., Dolan, R. J., Liu, Y., & Schwartenbeck, P. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.12.028 · Cited by 100
Compositional Inductive Biases in Function Learning
Schulz, E., Tenenbaum, J. B., Duvenaud, D., Speekenbrink, M., & Gershman, S. J. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.002 · Cited by 94
Self-citationUnderstanding Human Intelligence through Human Limitations
Griffiths, T. L. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.001 · Cited by 88
Self-citationPretense, Counterfactuals, and Bayesian Causal Models: Why What Is Not Real Really Matters
Weisberg, D. S., & Gopnik, A. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12069 · Cited by 166
Theory learning as stochastic search in the language of thought
Ullman, T. D., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2012) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.07.005 · Cited by 89
Self-citationLaszlo, S., & Plaut, D. C. (2011) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.001 · Cited by 98
Bayesian Models of Conceptual Development: Learning as Building Models of the World
Ullman, T. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084833 · Cited by 102
Self-citationFaster Teaching by POMDP Planning
Rafferty, A. N., Brunskill, E., Griffiths, T. L., & Shafto, P. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_37 · Cited by 87
Self-citation(2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027236.001.0001 · Cited by 83
Perek, F., & Goldberg, A. E. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.019 · Cited by 82
Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges
Coenen, A., Nelson, J. D., & Gureckis, T. M. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1470-5 · Cited by 84
The computational challenge of social learning
FeldmanHall, O., & Nassar, M. R. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.09.002 · Cited by 79
Kwisthout, J., Bekkering, H., & van Rooij, I. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.02.008 · Cited by 73
Computational Foundations of Natural Intelligence
van Gerven, M. A. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2017.00112 · Cited by 76
Fundamental processes in sensorimotor learning: Reasoning, refinement, and retrieval
Tsay, J. S., Kim, H. E., McDougle, S. D., Taylor, J. A., Haith, A. M., Avraham, G., Krakauer, J. W., Collins, A. G. E., & Ivry, R. B. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.91839 · Cited by 80
A neural circuit model of decision uncertainty and change-of-mind
Atiya, N. A. A., Rañó, I., Prasad, G., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10316-8 · Cited by 69
The Nature of Physical Computation
Shagrir, O. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197552384.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Learning a commonsense moral theory
Max Kleiman-weiner, A., Saxe, R. R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005 · Cited by 73
Self-citationThe psychological representation of modality
Phillips, J., & Knobe, J. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12165 · Cited by 68
Modeling language and cognition with deep unsupervised learning: a tutorial overview
Zorzi, M., Testolin, A., & Stoianov, I. P. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00515 · Cited by 71
Neural evidence for Bayesian trial-by-trial adaptation on the N400 during semantic priming
Delaney-Busch, N., Morgan, E., Lau, E. F., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.001 · Cited by 73
Bayesian analogy with relational transformations.
Lu, H., Chen, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0028719 · Cited by 72
Kruschke, J. K. (2012) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02063.x · Cited by 65
A cognitive approach to human–AI complementarity in dynamic decision-making
González, C., & Heidari, H. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00499-x · Cited by 73
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation
Colombo, M., & Hartmann, S. (2015) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axv036 · Cited by 66
Hierarchical Bayesian models of delusion
Williams, D. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.03.003 · Cited by 67
Williams, D. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1768-x · Cited by 63
The Impact of Language Experience on Language and Reading
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2018) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0000000000000144 · Cited by 64
Computational Resource Demands of a Predictive Bayesian Brain
Kwisthout, J., & van Rooij, I. (2019) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-019-00032-3 · Cited by 68
Considering Counterfactuals: The Relationship between Causal Learning and Pretend Play
Alison Gopnik, C., & Walker, C. M. (2013) · American journal of play · Cited by 57
On the Necessity of U‐Shaped Learning
Carlucci, L., & Case, J. (2013) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12002 · Cited by 58
Human modeling for human–robot collaboration
Hiatt, L. M., Narber, C., Bekele, E., Khemlani, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2017) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917690592 · Cited by 65
The Computational Origin of Representation
Piantadosi, S. T. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09540-9 · Cited by 71
Embodied Human Computer Interaction
Pustejovsky, J. D., & Krishnaswamy, N. (2021) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-021-00727-5 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, Thomas L.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 357-364
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167956961
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- inductive bias, mental representation, top-down modeling, connectionist models, neural mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Humans, Models, Psychological, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
