Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 435

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The next protein transition

Open access
Aiking, Harry, de Boer, Joop·2020·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Background Meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals requires a relatively rapid transition towards a circular economy. Therefore, a multidisciplinary perspective is required to sketch why a transition from diets based primarily on animal proteins towards diets based primarily on plant proteins products is extremely urgent for both food security and sustainability. Scope and approach This review starts out by identifying ecological, economic and social aspects of sustainable food consumption. Subsequently, it is argued how protein supply is underlying and linking the top-3 of anthropogenic impacts based on the planetary boundaries concept, i.e. 1) biodiversity loss, 2) nitrogen cycle acceleration, and 3) carbon cycle acceleration (resulting in climate change). These environmental impacts associated with current Western food consumption need to be reduced urgently. In order to address the inefficiencies inherent to current dietary patterns, therefore, a ranked list of more sustainable options is proposed, based on their order of magnitude. Addressing consumers, industry, and governmental stakeholders plus cultural aspects, challenges and options are sketched. Key findings and conclusions Clearly, a dietary transition from primarily animal towards plant protein products is required. Fortunately, new dietary guidelines are increasingly taking sustainability into account and the contours of a diet transition are slowly emerging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.008

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. van Dooren, 2015, Combining low price, low climate impact and high nutritional value in one shopping basket through diet optimization by linear programming, Sustainability, 7, 12837, 10.3390/su70912837 · doi:10.3390/su70912837
  2. Heerwagen, 2014, Can increased organic consumption mitigate climate changes?, British Food Journal, 116, 1314, 10.1108/BFJ-02-2013-0049 · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2013-0049
  3. Sjauw-Koen-Fa, 2016, Critical success factors for smallholder inclusion in high value-adding supply chains by Food and Multinational Enterprises, The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 19, 83
  4. Zalasiewicz, 2016, A history of layers: What mark will we leave on the planet?, Scientific American, 315, 31

Cited by

See all 435

Metadata

Authors
Aiking, H., & de Boer, J.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
105
Pages
515-522
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883492751
Cited by
435
References
78
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The next protein transition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.008
The paper
Aiking, H., & de Boer, J. (2020). The next protein transition. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.