Cited by 69Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactWaste Management and Recycling

Upcycling of food waste and food loss-A sustainable approach in the food sector

Rakesh, B., Mahendran, R.·2024·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104274

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rakesh, B., & Mahendran, R.
Affiliations
National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management - Thanjavur (IN)
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
143
Pages
104274
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388947340
Cited by
69
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 11
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Florida
  • Deutsch-Französische Hochschule
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
food waste upcycling, food waste, food loss, upcycled food, food waste management, consumer acceptance, food neophobia, consumer behavior, circular bioeconomy, food supply chain sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review