The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background There is increasing consensus that transitioning towards reduced meat consumption and more plant-based diets is a key feature to address important health and sustainability challenges. However, relevant evidence that may inform these transitions remains fragmented with no overarching rationale or theoretical framework, which limits the ability to design and deliver coordinated efforts to address these challenges. Scope and approach Eleven databases were systematically searched using sets of keywords referring meat curtailment, meat substitution and plant-based diets, as well as consumer choice, appraisal or behavior (2602 articles selected for title and abstract screening; 161 full-texts assessed for eligibility; 110 articles selected for extraction and coding). Barriers and enablers were identified and integrated into an overarching framework (i.e., COM-B system), which conceptualizes behavior as being influenced by three broad components: capability, opportunity and motivation. Key findings and conclusions This review mapped potential barriers and enablers in terms of capability, opportunity, and motivation to reduce meat consumption and follow more plant-based diets. These included lack of information for consumers and difficulty to acquire new cooking skills (barrier, capability), changes in service provision in collective meal contexts (enabler, opportunity), and positive taste expectations for plant-based meals (enabler, motivation). Evidence on variables referring to the motivation domain is clearly increasing, but there is a striking need for studies that include capability and opportunity variables as well. The results of this review are relevant to a variety of fields and audiences interested in promoting sustainable living and health improvements through dietary choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4 · Cited by 10,880
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216 · Cited by 6,085
Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 · Cited by 4,888
Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O’Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E. M., Colquhoun, H., Grimshaw, J. M., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9 · Cited by 3,819 · cited 2×
“The COM-B model is linked to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (Atkins et al., 2017), which has been obtained from a synthesis of 33 theories of behavior and behavior change (Cane, O’Conner & Michie, 2012).”
MethodAnalysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change
Springmann, M., Godfray, H. C. J., Rayner, M., & Scarborough, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1523119113 · Cited by 1,262
Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5 · Cited by 989
Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors
Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010 · Cited by 656
Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030 · Cited by 329
Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government
Michie, S., & West, R. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.649445 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Rashwan, A. K., Osman, A. I., Abdelshafy, A. M., Mo, J., & Chen, W. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2279696 · Cited by 144
Magrini, M.-B., Fernandez-Inigo, H., Doré, A., & Pauly, O. (2021) · Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies · doi:10.1007/s41130-021-00146-y · Cited by 25
Sustainable Diets for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management
Mendoza-Vasconez, A. S., Landry, M. J., Crimarco, A., Bladier, C., & Gardner, C. D. (2021) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-021-00929-0 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Graça, J., Godinho, C. A., & Truninger, M.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 91
- Pages
- 380-390
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966376844
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 23.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.