The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensory attributes of edible insects and insect-based foods – Future outlooks for enhancing consumer appeal
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background Edible insects are considered a new alternative sustainable source of proteins that exhibits higher feed-conversion efficiency and has a less negative environmental impact, compared to conventional animal-derived protein sources. Highly nutritional edible insects may help solve issues of global malnutrition and food insecurity, while byproducts have the potential for practical application in the food industry, agriculture, and medicine. Despite these numerous benefits, negative attitudes toward insects as food exist in societies where it is not part of their culture to consume insects, raising barriers to the wider introduction of edible insects in the diet on a regular basis. Scope and approach In this review, we discuss the sensory characteristics, such as flavor and texture, of edible insect and insect-based foods, their contribution to consumers’ attitudes toward edible insects, and approaches to alter the quality of sensory attributes—from insect farming and processing to novel product formulation and taste education. Key findings and conclusions Sensory and visual characteristics of edible insects, and availability of information on their origin and safety, are important factors in consumer appeal and their willingness to try eating insects in the future. Flavor and texture of edible insects depend largely on the insect species, its development stage, and the way it is processed. Recent findings on insect production, processing, and formulation of insect-based foods, as well as ways to increase familiarity with edible insects, demonstrate the potential to enhance the acceptability of insects as a novel food.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201200735 · Cited by 1,796
Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security
van Huis, A., Itterbeeck, J. V., Klunder, H. C., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., & Vantomme, P. (2013) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 1,694
The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review
van Huis, A., & Oonincx, D. G. A. B. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8 · Cited by 1,034
Oonincx, D. G. A. B., van Broekhoven, S., van Huis, A., & van Loon, J. J. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144601 · Cited by 945
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005 · Cited by 782
Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review
Belluco, S., Losasso, C., Maggioletti, M., Alonzi, C. C., Paoletti, M. G., & Ricci, A. (2013) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12014 · Cited by 708
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4375 · Cited by 626
The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China
Hartmann, C., Shi, J., Giusto, A., & Siegrist, M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.013 · Cited by 596
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishyna, M., Chen, J., & Benjamin, O.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 141-148
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989564900
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensory attributes of edible insects and insect-based foods – Future outlooks for enhancing consumer appeal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.016
- The paper
- Mishyna, M., Chen, J., & Benjamin, O. (2020). Sensory attributes of edible insects and insect-based foods – Future outlooks for enhancing consumer appeal. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.