The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Membrane technologies assisting plant-based and agro-food by-products processing: A comprehensive review
Abstract
Abstract Background Nowadays, membrane-based technologies (e.g. microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, membrane distillation, and pervaporation) have demonstrated to meet the requirements to be involved in different food and bioproduct processes. Scope and approach Several applications have been developed, including either separation, recovery or concentration of bioactive molecules from agro-food products and by-products, treatment of natural extracts, recovery of aromas from natural and processed products, production of non-alcoholic beverages, as the most popular ones. Therefore, the goal of this review is to give a comprehensive outlook of the latest developments focused on the separation, fractionation and concentration of several bioactive compounds contained in their original sources, as well as the food processes-assisted by membrane technologies. Key findings and conclusions Throughout this review, ongoing literature has been analysed, discussing the relevant insights according to the type of membrane-based separation process, properties of molecules, membrane features and key factors influencing the separation performance of those technologies. Specific applications have been analysed and discussed, highlighting typical advantages and drawbacks over conventional technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review
Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051 · Cited by 1,166
Galanakis, C. M. (2013) · Food and Bioproducts Processing · doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2013.01.004 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Edible Films and Coatings as Food-Quality Preservers: An Overview
Díaz-Montes, E., & Castro-Muñoz, R. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10020249 · Cited by 469
Self-citationPulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing
Arshad, R. N., Abdul-Malek, Z., Roobab, U., Munir, M. A., Naderipour, A., Qureshi, M. I., El-Din Bekhit, A., Liu, Z.-W., & Aadil, R. M. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041 · Cited by 293
Teshome, E., Teka, T. A., Nandasiri, R., Rout, J. R., Harouna, D. V., Astatkie, T., & Urugo, M. M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15107840 · Cited by 76
Separation, Characterization, and Handling of Microalgae by Dielectrophoresis
Abt, V., Gringel, F., Han, A., Neubauer, P., & Birkholz, M. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8040540 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Castro-Muñoz, R., Boczkaj, G., Gontarek, E., Cassano, A., & Fíla, V.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 219-232
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996020521
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane technologies assisting plant-based and agro-food by-products processing: A comprehensive review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.003
- The paper
- Castro-Muñoz, R., Boczkaj, G., Gontarek, E., Cassano, A., & Fíla, V. (2020). Membrane technologies assisting plant-based and agro-food by-products processing: A comprehensive review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
