Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing

Arshad, Rai Naveed, Abdul-Malek, Zulkurnain, Roobab, Ume, Munir, Muhammad Abdullah, Naderipour, Amirreza, Qureshi, Muhammad Imran, El-Din Bekhit, Alaa, Liu, Zhi-Wei, Aadil, Rana Muhammad·2021·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background Sustainable food supply is a primary concern for food industries, governments, and international agencies worldwide. Food industries are under continuous pressure to develop processing technologies that simultaneously preserve the nutritional value of foods, improve the bio-accessibility of nutrients, environment friendly and meet consumers' demands of sensory attributes. Furthermore, increasing population and inadequate cultivable land also demand transformations in the existing food processing techniques. Therefore, minimizing food wastages, sustainable developments in preservation, nutrient security, and food safety are essential elements for future requirements. Scope and approach This study refers to the roles of the pulsed electric field (PEF) in sustainable food processing systems. It also discusses the effects of this emerging technology on achieving the critical industrial goals of enhanced food quality, decreased water usage, reduced emissions, increased energy efficiency, and the ability to utilize by-products from waste food. The current study also emphasizes the need to understand factors that may limit this emerging technology's industrial uptake. Key findings and conclusions A combined multi-dimensional methodology through the entire food supply is essential to meet the worldwide food processing challenges. A limited worldwide food resource must have a balanced methodology for raw material, water, energy, and nutrient content. PEF technology fulfils significant needs for sustainable food processing as requires fewer resources to produce quantities of existing foods that are nutritionally suitable for advancing health and wellbeing, long shelf lives, and transportable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 104 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Arshad, R. N., Abdul-Malek, Z., Roobab, U., Munir, M. A., Naderipour, A., Qureshi, M. I., El-Din Bekhit, A., Liu, Z.-W., & Aadil, R. M.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
111
Pages
43-54
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134636833
Cited by
293
References
104
FWCI
19.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041
The paper
Arshad, R. N., Abdul-Malek, Z., Roobab, U., Munir, M. A., Naderipour, A., Qureshi, M. I., El-Din Bekhit, A., Liu, Z.-W., & Aadil, R. M. (2021). Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.