The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing
Abstract
Abstract Background Sustainable food supply is a primary concern for food industries, governments, and international agencies worldwide. Food industries are under continuous pressure to develop processing technologies that simultaneously preserve the nutritional value of foods, improve the bio-accessibility of nutrients, environment friendly and meet consumers' demands of sensory attributes. Furthermore, increasing population and inadequate cultivable land also demand transformations in the existing food processing techniques. Therefore, minimizing food wastages, sustainable developments in preservation, nutrient security, and food safety are essential elements for future requirements. Scope and approach This study refers to the roles of the pulsed electric field (PEF) in sustainable food processing systems. It also discusses the effects of this emerging technology on achieving the critical industrial goals of enhanced food quality, decreased water usage, reduced emissions, increased energy efficiency, and the ability to utilize by-products from waste food. The current study also emphasizes the need to understand factors that may limit this emerging technology's industrial uptake. Key findings and conclusions A combined multi-dimensional methodology through the entire food supply is essential to meet the worldwide food processing challenges. A limited worldwide food resource must have a balanced methodology for raw material, water, energy, and nutrient content. PEF technology fulfils significant needs for sustainable food processing as requires fewer resources to produce quantities of existing foods that are nutritionally suitable for advancing health and wellbeing, long shelf lives, and transportable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2018) · A New Era in Global Health · doi:10.1891/9780826190123.ap02 · Cited by 19,351
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2022) · Sustainable Development Goals · doi:10.5040/9781509934058.0025 · Cited by 6,562
Pesticides and human chronic diseases: Evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives
Mostafalou, S., & Abdollahi, M. (2013) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025 · Cited by 1,261
Review of Green Food Processing techniques. Preservation, transformation, and extraction
Chemat, F., Rombaut, N., Meullemiestre, A., Turk, M., Perino, S., Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S., & Abert-Vian, M. (2017) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.016 · Cited by 850
Barba, F. J., Parniakov, O., Pereira, S. A., Wiktor, A., Grimi, N., Boussetta, N., Saraiva, J. A., Raso, J., Martin-Belloso, O., Witrowa-Rajchert, D., et al. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.015 · Cited by 776
Barba, F. J., Zhu, Z., Koubaa, M., Sant'Ana, A. S., & Orlien, V. (2016) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.01.006 · Cited by 701
A review on mechanisms and commercial aspects of food preservation and processing
Amit, S. K., Uddin, M. M., Rahman, R., Islam, S. M. R., & Khan, M. S. (2017) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-017-0130-8 · Cited by 694
Active and intelligent packaging in meat industry
Fang, Z., Zhao, Y., Warner, R. D., & Johnson, S. K. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.01.002 · Cited by 642
Environmental impact of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies in food processing
Pereira, R. N., & Vicente, A. A. (2010) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.013 · Cited by 572
Trends of spray drying: A critical review on drying of fruit and vegetable juices
Shishir, M. R. I., & Chen, W. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.006 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Lisboa, H. M., Pasquali, M. B., dos Anjos, A. I., Sarinho, A. M., de Melo, E. D., Andrade, R., Batista, L., Lima, J., Diniz, Y., & Barros, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16188223 · Cited by 249
Non-thermal techniques and the “hurdle” approach: How is food technology evolving?
Bigi, F., Maurizzi, E., Quartieri, A., De Leo, R., Gullo, M., & Pulvirenti, A. (2023) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.12.015 · Cited by 92
Tongdonyod, S., Thikham, S., Kittiwachana, S., Wichaphon, J., & Klangpetch, W. (2023) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2023.103507 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Arshad, R. N., Abdul-Malek, Z., Roobab, U., Munir, M. A., Naderipour, A., Qureshi, M. I., El-Din Bekhit, A., Liu, Z.-W., & Aadil, R. M.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 43-54
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3134636833
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041
- The paper
- Arshad, R. N., Abdul-Malek, Z., Roobab, U., Munir, M. A., Naderipour, A., Qureshi, M. I., El-Din Bekhit, A., Liu, Z.-W., & Aadil, R. M. (2021). Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.