Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Composition and functionality of bee pollen: A review

Thakur, Mamta, Nanda, Vikas·2020·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background The food industry today is returning to natural foods after emphasizing the processed products due to the higher consumer demand for foods which are well recognized by healthy nutrients. Bee pollen is known as a natural super food due to its indispensable nutritional and medicinal properties. However, the physico-chemical and nutritional properties of bee pollen are ambiguous which vary greatly due to the difference of botanical and geographical origin. Scope and approach The current study, therefore, presents an updated overview by critically reviewing the literature for chemical constituents (sugars, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, vitamins, and phenolic compounds) of bee pollen since 2009 from more than 20 nations of the world. The functional properties of different plant-derived bee pollen and their food applications are also discussed for the first time. Key findings and conclusions As per the systematic review of above 100 studies, the bee pollen contains average 54.22% (18.50–84.25%) carbohydrates, 21.30% (4.50–40.70%) proteins, 5.31% (0.41–13.50%) lipids, 8.75% (0.15–31.26%) fibre, 2.91% (0.50–7.75%) ash, 13.41 g/100 g (2.77–28.49 g/100 g) glucose, 15.36 g/100 g (4.9–33.48 g/100 g) fructose, 4.25 g/100 g (0.05–9.02 g/100 g) sucrose, 4951.61 mg/kg (3.06–13366.60 mg/kg) potassium, 4157.86 mg/kg (234.40–9587.00 mg/kg) phosphorus, 1751.22 mg/kg (1.09–5752.19 mg/kg) calcium, 1246.99 mg/kg (44.00–4680.53 mg/kg) magnesium, 46.97 mg/kg (0.10–105.80 mg/kg) zinc, 197.41 mg/kg (2.60–1180.00 mg/kg) iron, and 30.59 mg GAE/g (0.69–213.20 mg GAE/g) total phenolic content. Bee pollen, based on its functional properties can be recommended as a natural food ingredient in several processed food products. Further, the present paper strongly focuses to investigate the mono-floral bee pollen from different geographical regions and related safety issues to establish the global pollen quality and safety standards in coming years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.001

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Metadata

Authors
Thakur, M., & Nanda, V.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
98
Pages
82-106
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006437187
Cited by
365
References
74
FWCI
31.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition and functionality of bee pollen: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.001
The paper
Thakur, M., & Nanda, V. (2020). Composition and functionality of bee pollen: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.