Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel technologies for the production of bioactive peptides

Ulug, Sule Keskin, Jahandideh, Forough, Wu, Jianping·2021·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background Bioactive peptides derived from food proteins have great potential for uses as functional food ingredients or nutraceuticals. They are prepared mainly by enzymatic hydrolysis. High specificity, mild conditions, a lack of residual organic solvents and toxic chemicals in the final peptide preparations have positioned enzymatic hydrolysis the most preferred method for the production of bioactive peptides; however, the high cost of enzymes, a low yield, and limited choice of food-grade enzymes pose the industry seek for alternatives. Scope and approach This review mainly focuses on the potential use of novel technologies for the production of bioactive peptides, given the context of the conventional methods. The mechanisms of these novel technologies are presented, along with their respective examples of use. The advantages and challenges of each technology employed for the production of bioactive peptides are discussed. Key findings and conclusions: There is an increasing interest in preparing bioactive peptides using novel technologies such as high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasounds, ohmic heating, pulsed electric fields, microwave-assisted extractions, and subcritical water hydrolysis. These technologies are in general less effective than the conventional methods, and thus they are often applied in combination with the enzymatic method. Subcritical water hydrolysis is capable of cleaving peptide bonds but suffers from a lack of specificity in cleaving peptide bonds and peptide modifications. The new trend towards the use of novel technologies in producing bioactive peptides continues to gain momentum because they are environmentally friendly, innovative, and sustainable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.002

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 117 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Ulug, S. K., Jahandideh, F., & Wu, J.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
108
Pages
27-39
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113134891
Cited by
386
References
117
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel technologies for the production of bioactive peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.002
The paper
Ulug, S. K., Jahandideh, F., & Wu, J. (2021). Novel technologies for the production of bioactive peptides. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.