The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update of the concept of type 5 resistant starch (RS5): Self-assembled starch V-type complexes
Abstract
Abstract Background All starch fractions not digested and absorbed in the small intestine of healthy humans are considered resistant starch (RS), and their habitual intake has been associated with different beneficial effects on health. In particular, starch-lipid V-type complexes, such as starch-fatty acids and starch-monoglycerides, have traditionally been classified as type 5 RS. Scope and approach Other starch V-type complexes have emerged more recently, such as starch-glycerol, starch-amino acids, starch-peptides, starch-proteins, starch-lipid-protein, starch-polyphenols, starch-other polysaccharides, among others, which do not fit well into the traditionally accepted nutritional classification of RS. Here, these complexes are analyzed in order to highlight the pertinence of redefining RS5 for the inclusion of this new type of RS. Key findings and conclusions All those self-assembled starch V-type complexes can be classified as RS5. However, starch-polyphenol V-type complexes should particularly be further investigated to ensure their inclusion in this new extended RS5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus
Minekus, M., Alminger, M., Alvito, P., Ballance, S., Bohn, T., Bourlieu, C., Carrière, F., Boutrou, R., Corredig, M., Dupont, D., et al. (2014) · Food Funct. · doi:10.1039/c3fo60702j · Cited by 5,824
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 3,809
The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota–gut–brain communication
Dalile, B., Van Oudenhove, L., Vervliet, B., & Verbeke, K. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0157-3 · Cited by 3,357
Starch Retrogradation: A Comprehensive Review
Wang, S., Li, C., Copeland, L., Niu, Q., & Wang, S. (2015) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12143 · Cited by 1,664
Pérez, S., & Bertoft, E. (2010) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.201000013 · Cited by 1,492
The Effect of Probiotics on the Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids by Human Intestinal Microbiome
Markowiak-Kopeć, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12041107 · Cited by 1,219
Analysis of resistant starch: a method for foods and food products
Goñi, I., García-Diz, L., Mañas, E., & Saura-Calixto, F. (1996) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0308-8146(95)00222-7 · Cited by 744
Wang, S., & Copeland, L. (2013) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c3fo60258c · Cited by 685
Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response
Englyst, K. N., Englyst, H. N., Hudson, G. J., Cole, T. J., & Cummings, J. H. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.3.448 · Cited by 682
Starch–lipid and starch–lipid–protein complexes: A comprehensive review
Wang, S., Chao, C., Cai, J., Niu, B., Copeland, L., & Wang, S. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12550 · Cited by 582
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutiérrez, T. J., & Tovar, J.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 109
- Pages
- 711-724
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3128678799
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 23.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update of the concept of type 5 resistant starch (RS5): Self-assembled starch V-type complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.078
- The paper
- Gutiérrez, T. J., & Tovar, J. (2021). Update of the concept of type 5 resistant starch (RS5): Self-assembled starch V-type complexes. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
