Cited by 92Microbial Inactivation MethodsRadiation Effects and DosimetryListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

Non-thermal techniques and the “hurdle” approach: How is food technology evolving?

Open access
Bigi, Francesco, Maurizzi, Enrico, Quartieri, Andrea, De Leo, Riccardo, Gullo, Maria, Pulvirenti, Andrea·2023·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.12.015

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bigi, F., Maurizzi, E., Quartieri, A., De Leo, R., Gullo, M., & Pulvirenti, A.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Maurizzi, Enrico
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
132
Pages
11-39
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313367051
Cited by
92
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 9
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
non-thermal food processing, hurdle technology, microbial inactivation, food preservation, chemical preservatives, sustainable food processing, food safety, food quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review