Cited by 38Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Hybrid sterility genes in mice (Mus musculus): a peculiar case of PRDM9 incompatibility

Forejt, Jiri, Jansa, Petr, Parvanov, Emil·2021·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Hybrid sterility is a critical step in the evolution of reproductive barriers between diverging taxa during the process of speciation. Recent studies of young subspecies of the house mouse revealed a multigenic nature and frequent polymorphism of hybrid sterility genes as well as the recurrent engagement of the meiosis-specific gene PR domain-containing 9 (Prdm9) and X-linked loci. Prdm9-controlled hybrid sterility is essentially chromosomal in nature, conditioned by the sequence divergence between subspecies. Depending on the Prdm9 interallelic interactions and the X-linked Hstx2 locus, the same homologs either regularly recombine and synapse, or show impaired DNA DSB repair, asynapsis, and early meiotic arrest. Thus, Prdm9-dependent hybrid sterility points to incompatibilities affecting meiotic recombination as a possible mechanism of reproductive isolation between (sub)species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparative genomic evidence in cats and house mice suggests that some regions on the X chromosome are 'protected' from recombination, causing hybrid male offspring to be sterile if altered, thereby reinforcing the distinction among lineages.

    “For example, comparative genomic evidence in cats (Bredemeyer et al. 2021) and house mice (Forejt et al. 2021) suggests that some regions on the X chromosome are “protected” from recombination, causing hybrid male offspring to be sterile if altered, thereby reinforcing the distinction among lineages.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forejt, J., Jansa, P., & Parvanov, E.
Affiliations
Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
1095-1108
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177680106
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grantová Agentura České Republiky (20-04075S)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
hybrid sterility, PRDM9, house mouse, Mus musculus, speciation, reproductive isolation, meiotic recombination, DNA double-strand break repair, asynapsis, meiotic arrest, sequence divergence
MeSH terms
Animals, Infertility, Male, Meiosis, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Mice, Homologous Recombination, Reproductive Isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review