Cited by 57RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyCellular transport and secretion

Biased codon usage in signal peptides: A role in protein export

Zalucki, Yaramah M., Beacham, Ifor R., Jennings, Michael P.·2009·Trends in Microbiology

Abstract

The signal peptide of proteins exported via the general secretory pathway encodes structural features that enable the targeting and export of the protein to the periplasm. Recent studies have shown biased codon usage at the second amino acid position and a high usage of non-optimal codons within the signal peptide. Altering these biases in codon usage can have deleterious effects on protein folding and export. We propose that these codon-usage biases act in concert to optimize the export process through modulating ribosome spacing on the transcript. This highlights a new aspect of protein export and implies that codon usage in the signal peptide encodes signals that are important for protein targeting and export to the periplasm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tim.2009.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of rare codons in Sec signal peptides is not casual but is highly important to ensure efficient interaction of export proteins with the secretory machinery and to prevent their degradation.

    “These results confirmed that the presence of rare codons present in Sec signal peptides is not casual, but is highly important to ensure an efficient interaction of the export proteins with the components of the secretory machinery and also to prevent their degradation [150,151].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zalucki, Y. M., Beacham, I. R., & Jennings, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Jennings, Michael P.
Venue
Trends in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
146-150
ISSN
0966-842X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060100457
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
codon usage bias, signal peptide, protein export, general secretory pathway, periplasmic targeting, protein folding
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Codon, Escherichia coli, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Folding, Protein Transport, Protein Sorting Signals, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review