Pen or keyboard in beginning writing instruction? Some perspectives from embodied cognition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may affect the learning process in a negative way.
“Thus, the ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may seem somewhat misguided as it could affect the learning process in a negative way (Alonso, 2015; Mangen and Balsvik, 2016; Arnold et al., 2017).”
From Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom (2024) · cites this paper as Mangen and Balsvik, 2016
Cites
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 · Cited by 5,936 · see citing works
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness
O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000115 · Cited by 3,126 · see citing works
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683 · see citing works
Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-6204 · Cited by 2,631 · see citing works
Perception and Action Planning
Prinz, W. (1997) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/713752551 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future: Topics in Cognitive Science
Barsalou, L. W. (2010) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain
James, K. H. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00883.x · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J.-C., & Velay, J.-L. (2006) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., & Tømte, C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.001 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Alamargot, D., & Morin, M.-F. (2015) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.011 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Handwriting versus keyboard writing: effect on word recall.
Mangen, A., Anda, L. G., Oxborough, G. H., & Brønnick, K. (2015) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.1 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat differs in visual recognition of handwritten vs. printed letters? An fMRI study
Longcamp, M., Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21105 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ose Askvik, E., van der Weel, F. R. (., & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Van der Weel, F. R. (., & Van der Meer, A. L. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219945 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“…are more and more replacing traditional handwriting (Longcamp et al., 2006; Kiefer et al., 2015), and as both writing and reading are becoming increasingly digitized in the classroom, we need to examine the implications of this practice (Mangen and Balsvik, 2016; Patterson and Patterson, 2017).”
BackgroundMayer, C., Wallner, S., Budde-Spengler, N., Braunert, S., Arndt, P. A., & Kiefer, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03054 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mangen, A., & Balsvik, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Stavanger (NO)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Mangen, Anne
- ORCID
- Mangen, Anne
- Venue
- Trends in Neuroscience and Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 99-106
- ISSN
- 2211-9493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2460516508
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 23.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Neuroscience and Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Corporeality, Perception, and Education
- Keywords
- handwriting, keyboard writing, embodied cognition, material affordances, sensorimotor contingencies, digital writing, writing development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
