Cited by 85Reading and Literacy DevelopmentFace Recognition and PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

What differs in visual recognition of handwritten vs. printed letters? An fMRI study

Open access
Longcamp, Marieke, Hlushchuk, Yevhen, Hari, Riitta·2011·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

In models of letter recognition, handwritten letters are considered as a particular font exemplar, not qualitatively different in their processing from printed letters. Yet, some data suggest that recognizing handwritten letters might rely on distinct processes, possibly related to motor knowledge. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare the neural correlates of perceiving handwritten letters vs. standard printed letters. Statistical analysis circumscribed to frontal brain regions involved in hand‐movement triggering and execution showed that processing of handwritten letters is supported by a stronger activation of the left primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area. At the whole‐brain level, additional differences between handwritten and printed letters were observed in the right superior frontal, middle occipital, and parahippocampal gyri, and in the left inferior precentral and the fusiform gyri. The results are suggested to indicate embodiment of the visual perception of handwritten letters. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21105

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process of writing words by hand may provide a unique impetus to learning.

    “Research has also demonstrated that the process of writing words by hand may provide a unique impetus to learning (38).”
  • Most studies on the relationship between handwriting and memory have shown that people remember information better when it is handwritten compared with when it is typed.

    “Statistically, most studies on the relationship between handwriting and memory (including those conducted in Japan, Norway, and the United States) have shown that people remember information better when it is handwritten compared with when it is typed [50,53].”
  • The motor and premotor cortices are significantly more activated during the production of handwritten letters compared with printed ones.

    “Longcamp and colleagues [50] demonstrated that the motor and premotor cortices are significantly more activated during the production of handwritten letters compared with printed ones.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longcamp, M., Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1250-1259
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2026720311
Cited by
85
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondation Fyssen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
handwritten letters, printed letters, letter recognition, visual perception, motor knowledge, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, embodiment, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, frontal cortex, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Handwriting, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review