Cited by 24Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Predicting acute odynophagia during lung cancer radiotherapy using observations derived from patient-centred nursing care

Open access
Olling, Karina, Nyeng, Dorte Wendelboe, Wee, Leonard·2018·Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology

Abstract

During radiotherapy, lung cancer patients commonly experience pain while swallowing (odynophagia) of food and drink. Observations from patient-centred nursing practice have been used to generate predictive models for odynophagia needing prescription pain medication during external beam lung radiotherapy for non-small cell and small-cell lung cancer. Three multivariate logistic models were evaluated in repeat cross-validation: a manual-stepwise model and two supervised machine learning models. Overall predictive performance was good. Correct classification rates ranged from 0.82 to 0.84, and areas under the receiver operator curve ranged from 0.83 to 0.85. Model sensitivity (range: 0.92-0.97) was higher than model specificity (range: 0.58-0.63). Further validation of the models in clinical context is required. A predictive model for pain medication for odynophagia prior to commencement of radiotherapy would support Radiotherapy Technologists Nurses (RTNs) in directing nursing interventions towards patients at risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.01.002

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study noted a concern about the impact of AI-based digital tools on the workflow of clinicians.

    “One study also noted a concern about the impact of AI-based digital tools on the workflow of clinicians (Olling et al., 2018).”
  • In studies where nurses did not lead, nurses were actively involved by identifying eligible cancer patients, undertaking clinical assessments or interviews, or analysing oncological patient data to identify clinical issues to compare to the outputs of a predictive model.

    “In these studies, nurses were actively involved by identifying eligible cancer patients for a study, undertaking clinical assessments or interviews as part of the data collection process, or analysing oncological patient data to identify clinical issues to compare to the outputs of a predictive model (Olling et al., 2018;Chiesa et al., 2021;Günther et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olling, K., Nyeng, D. W., & Wee, L.
Affiliations
Vejle Sygehus (DK)
Corresponding author
Olling, Karina
Venue
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
5
Pages
16-20
ISSN
2405-6324 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790631721
Cited by
24
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Radiotherapy Research Team (Vejle Hospital, Denmark)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
odynophagia, dysphagia, lung cancer, radiotherapy complications, analgesics, prediction model, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, external beam radiotherapy, nursing interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review