Cited by 52Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementUrban Green Space and Health

The impact of restorative destination environments on tourists' well-being and environmentally responsible behavior: A Reasonable Person Model

Qiu, Hanqin, Wang, Guoquan, Ren, Lianping, Zhang, Junjiao, Wang, Jinwei·2022·Tourism Management Perspectives

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101028

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiu, H., Wang, G., Ren, L., Zhang, J., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Nankai University (CN)
  • Macao University of Tourism (MO)
  • Beijing International Studies University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Guoquan
Venue
Tourism Management Perspectives
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
44
Pages
101028
ISSN
2211-9736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4303579266
Cited by
52
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tourism Management Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
tourist well-being, eudaimonic well-being, hedonic well-being, pro-environmental behavior, perceived crowding, mental fatigue, stress recovery, human-nature relationship, destination management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review