Cited by 385Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Plant chemical defense: at what cost?

Neilson, Elizabeth H., Goodger, Jason Q.D., Woodrow, Ian E., Møller, Birger Lindberg·2013·Trends in Plant Science

Abstract

Plants are sessile organisms and dependent on deployment of secondary metabolites for their response to biotic and abiotic challenges. A trade-off is envisioned between resources allocated to growth, development, and reproduction and to the biosynthesis, storage, and maintenance of secondary metabolites. However, increasing evidence suggests that secondary metabolites serve auxiliary roles, including functions associated with primary metabolism. In this opinion article, we examine how the costs of plant chemical defense can be offset by multifunctional biosynthesis and the optimization of primary metabolism. These additional benefits may negate the trade-off between primary and secondary metabolism, and provide plants with an innate plasticity required for growth, development, and interactions with their environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.01.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emergence of a more detailed understanding of plant metabolism may require revisiting the functional partitioning of primary metabolites, secondary metabolites, and plant hormones.

    “However, the emergence of a more detailed understanding of plant metabolism may require us to revisit this functional partitioning (Neilson et al., 2013;Maag et al., 2015;Kliebenstein, 2018;Pichersky and Raguso, 2018;Zhou et al., 2018).”
  • Plants likely manage costs of secondary metabolite production through regulation of biosynthesis, but controlled recycling of resulting compounds would enhance the plant's ability to recoup costs in challenging environments.

    “Plants likely manage costs of secondary metabolite production through the regulation of biosynthesis, but controlled recycling of the resulting compounds would enhance the plants ability to recoup costs in challenging environments (Neilson et al., 2013).”

Authors
Neilson, E. H., Goodger, J. Q. D., Woodrow, I. E., & Møller, B. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Neilson, Elizabeth H.
Venue
Trends in Plant Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
250-258
ISSN
1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068119633
Cited by
385
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Plant Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
plant chemical defense, secondary metabolites, primary metabolism, resource allocation trade-offs, plant plasticity, plant-environment interactions, growth and development
MeSH terms
Environment, Pheromones, Plants, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review