Cited by 47Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGene expression and cancer classification

Machine learning analysis using 77,044 genomic and transcriptomic profiles to accurately predict tumor type

Open access
Abraham, Jim, Heimberger, Amy B., Marshall, John, Heath, Elisabeth, Drabick, Joseph, Helmstetter, Anthony, Xiu, Joanne, Magee, Daniel +7 more·2021·Translational Oncology

Abstract

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) occurs in 3-5% of patients when standard histological diagnostic tests are unable to determine the origin of metastatic cancer. Typically, a CUP diagnosis is treated empirically and has very poor outcomes, with median overall survival less than one year. Gene expression profiling alone has been used to identify the tissue of origin but struggles with low neoplastic percentage in metastatic sites which is where identification is often most needed. MI GPSai, a Genomic Prevalence Score, uses DNA sequencing and whole transcriptome data coupled with machine learning to aid in the diagnosis of cancer. The algorithm trained on genomic data from 34,352 cases and genomic and transcriptomic data from 23,137 cases and was validated on 19,555 cases. MI GPSai predicted the tumor type in the labeled data set with an accuracy of over 94% on 93% of cases while deliberating amongst 21 possible categories of cancer. When also considering the second highest prediction, the accuracy increases to 97%. Additionally, MI GPSai rendered a prediction for 71.7% of CUP cases. Pathologist evaluation of discrepancies between submitted diagnosis and MI GPSai predictions resulted in change of diagnosis in 41.3% of the time. MI GPSai provides clinically meaningful information in a large proportion of CUP cases and inclusion of MI GPSai in clinical routine could improve diagnostic fidelity. Moreover, all genomic markers essential for therapy selection are assessed in this assay, maximizing the clinical utility for patients within a single test.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML strategies are able to combine genomic and transcriptomic profiles to accurately predict tumor type, identify genetic abnormalities, and provide other clinically meaningful information in clinical routine.

    “ML strategies are able to combine genomic and transcriptomic profiles to accurately predict tumor type, identify genetic abnormalities, and provide other clinically meaningful information in clinical routine [156].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]Massard C. Loriot Y. Fizazi K. Carcinomas of an unknown primary origin–diagnosis and treatment Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8 12 2011 701 710 22048624
  2. [2]Varadhachary G.R. Raber M.N. Cancer of unknown primary site N. Engl. J. Med. 371 8 2014 757 765 25140961
  3. [3]DeYoung B.R. Wick M.R. Immunohistologic evaluation of metastatic carcinomas of unknown origin: an algorithmic approach Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 17 3 2000 184 193 10968704
  4. [4]Anderson G.G. Weiss L.M. Determining tissue of origin for metastatic cancers: meta-analysis and literature review of immunohistochemistry performance Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 18 1 2010 3 8 19550296
  5. [5]Park S.Y. Kim B.H. Kim J.H. Lee S. Kang G.H. Panels of immunohistochemical markers help determine primary sites of metastatic adenocarcinoma Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 131 10 2007 1561 1567 17922593
  6. [6]Brown R.W. Campagna L.B. Dunn J.K. Cagle P.T. Immunohistochemical identification of tumor markers in metastatic adenocarcinoma. A diagnostic adjunct in the determination of primary site Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 107 1 1997 12 19 8980361
  7. [7]Erlander M.G. Ma X.J. Kesty N.C. Bao L. Salunga R. Schnabel C.A. Performance and clinical evaluation of the 92-gene real-time PCR assay for tumor classification J. Mol. Diagn. 13 5 2011 493 503 21708287 PMC3157614
  8. [8]Hainsworth J.D. Rubin M.S. Spigel D.R. Molecular gene expression profiling to predict the tissue of origin and direct site-specific therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a prospective trial of the Sarah Cannon research institute J. Clin. Oncol. 31 2 2013 217 223 23032625
  9. [9]Ross J.S. Wang K. Gay L. Comprehensive genomic profiling of carcinoma of unknown primary site: new routes to targeted therapies [published correction appears in JAMA Oncology 2019 Aug 1;5(8):1232] JAMA Oncol. 1 1 2015 40 49 26182302
  10. [11]Stancel G.A. Coffey D. Alvarez K. Identification of tissue of origin in body fluid specimens using a gene expression microarray assay Cancer Cytopathol. 120 1 2012 62 70 21717591
  11. [12]Dennis J.L. Hvidsten T.R. Wit E.C. Markers of adenocarcinoma characteristic of the site of origin: development of a diagnostic algorithm Clin. Cancer Res. 11 10 2005 3766 3772 15897574
  12. [13]Gamble A.R. Bell J.A. Ronan J.E. Pearson D. Ellis I.O. Use of tumour marker immunoreactivity to identify primary site of metastatic cancer BMJ 306 6873 1993 295 298 8461645 PMC1676878
  13. [14]Dobin A. Davis C.A. Schlesinger F. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner Bioinformatics 29 1 2013 15 21 23104886 PMC3530905
  14. [15]Patro R. Duggal G. Love M.I. Irizarry R.A. Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression Nat. Methods 14 4 2017 417 419 28263959 PMC5600148
  15. [16]Brennan C.W. Verhaak R.G. McKenna A. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma [published correction appears in Cell. 2014 Apr 24;157(3):753] Cell 155 2 2013 462 477 24120142 PMC3910500
  16. [17]Shah S.P. Köbel M. Senz J. Mutation of FOXL2 in granulosa-cell tumors of the ovary N. Engl. J. Med. 360 26 2009 2719 2729 19516027
  17. [20]Heinrich M.C. Corless C.L. Demetri G.D. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor J. Clin. Oncol. 21 23 2003 4342 4349 14645423
  18. [21]Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 490 7418 2012 61 70 23000897 PMC3465532
  19. [22]Tan P. Yeoh K.G. Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma Gastroenterology 149 5 2015 1153 1162 26073375
  20. [23]Miettinen M. Sobin L.H. Sarlomo-Rikala M. Immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with a reference to CD117 (KIT) Mod. Pathol. 13 10 2000 1134 1142 11048809
  21. [24]Garraway L.A. Widlund H.R. Rubin M.A. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma Nature 436 7047 2005 117 122 16001072
  22. [25]Markowski M.C. Bowen C. Gelmann E.P. Inflammatory cytokines induce phosphorylation and ubiquitination of prostate suppressor protein NKX3.1 Cancer Res. 68 17 2008 6896 6901 18757402 PMC2586101
  23. [27]Greco F.A. Hainsworth J.D. Renal cell carcinoma presenting as carcinoma of unknown primary site: recognition of a treatable patient subset Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 16 4 2018 e893 e898 29610002
  24. [28]Kato S. Krishnamurthy N. Banks K.C. Utility of genomic analysis in circulating tumor DNA from patients with carcinoma of unknown primary Cancer Res. 77 16 2017 4238 4246 28642281 PMC5729906
  25. [29]Moran S. Martínez-Cardús A. Sayols S. Epigenetic profiling to classify cancer of unknown primary: a multicentre, retrospective analysis Lancet Oncol. 17 10 2016 1386 1395 27575023
  26. [30]Peck M. Moffat D. Latham B. Badrick T. Review of diagnostic error in anatomical pathology and the role and value of second opinions in error prevention J. Clin. Pathol. 71 11 2018 995 1000 30068638
  27. [31]Bera K. Schalper K.A. Rimm D.L. Velcheti V. Madabhushi A. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 16 11 2019 703 715 31399699 PMC6880861
  28. [32]Jiao W. Atwal G. Polak P. A deep learning system accurately classifies primary and metastatic cancers using passenger mutation patterns Nat. Commun. 11 2020 728 32024849 PMC7002586
  29. [33]Stafford P. Brun M. Three methods for optimization of cross-laboratory and cross-platform microarray expression data Nucl. Acids Res. 35 10 2007 e72 17478523 PMC1904274

Cited by

Authors
Abraham, J., Heimberger, A. B., Marshall, J., Heath, E., Drabick, J., Helmstetter, A., Xiu, J., Magee, D., Stafford, P., Nabhan, C., Antani, S., Johnston, C., Oberley, M., Korn, W. M., & Spetzler, D.
Affiliations
  • Caris Life Sciences (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Penn State Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Spetzler, David
Venue
Translational Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
101016
ISSN
1936-5233 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121141020
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
cancer of unknown primary, tumor type prediction, DNA sequencing, whole transcriptome sequencing, tissue of origin, gene expression profiling, molecular diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review