Cited by 115Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentGenomics and Rare Diseases

Development of genome-derived tumor type prediction to inform clinical cancer care

Open access
Penson, Alexander, Camacho, Niedzica, Zheng, Youyun, Varghese, Anna M., Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat, Razavi, Pedram, Chandarlapaty, Sarat, Vallejo, Christina E. +16 more·2020·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Diagnosing the site of origin for cancer is a pillar of disease classification that has directed clinical care for more than a century. Even in an era of precision oncologic practice, in which treatment is increasingly informed by the presence or absence of mutant genes responsible for cancer growth and progression, tumor origin remains a critical factor in tumor biologic characteristics and therapeutic sensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether data derived from routine clinical DNA sequencing of tumors could complement conventional approaches to enable improved diagnostic accuracy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A machine learning approach was developed to predict tumor type from targeted panel DNA sequence data obtained at the point of care, incorporating both discrete molecular alterations and inferred features such as mutational signatures. This algorithm was trained on 7791 tumors representing 22 cancer types selected from a prospectively sequenced cohort of patients with advanced cancer. RESULTS: The correct tumor type was predicted for 5748 of the 7791 patients (73.8%) in the training set as well as 8623 of 11 644 patients (74.1%) in an independent cohort. Predictions were assigned probabilities that reflected empirical accuracy, with 3388 cases (43.5%) representing high-confidence predictions (>95% probability). Informative molecular features and feature categories varied widely by tumor type. Genomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA yielded accurate predictions in 45 of 60 cases (75.0%), suggesting that this approach may be applied in diverse clinical settings including as an adjunct to cancer screening. Likely tissues of origin were predicted from targeted tumor sequencing in 95 of 141 patients (67.4%) with cancers of unknown primary site. Applying this method prospectively to patients under active care enabled genome-directed reassessment of diagnosis in 2 patients initially presumed to have metastatic breast cancer, leading to the selection of more appropriate treatments, which elicited clinical responses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results suggest that the application of artificial intelligence to predict tissue of origin in oncologic practice can act as a useful complement to conventional histologic review to provide integrated pathologic diagnoses, often with important therapeutic implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3985

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genomics-based targeted NGS algorithms for cell-of-origin prediction have been rigorously evaluated and are being deployed and assessed for clinical utility.

    “This includes genomics-based algorithms, where targeted NGS algorithms have been rigorously evaluated and are currently being deployed and assessed for clinical utility (134, 135).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penson, A., Camacho, N., Zheng, Y., Varghese, A. M., Al-Ahmadie, H., Razavi, P., Chandarlapaty, S., Vallejo, C. E., Vakiani, E., Gilewski, T., Rosenberg, J. E., Shady, M., Tsui, D. W. Y., Reales, D. N., Abeshouse, A., Syed, A., Zehir, A., Schultz, N., Ladanyi, M., Solit, D. B., Klimstra, D. S., Hyman, D. M., Taylor, B. S., & Berger, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Corresponding author
  • Taylor, Barry S.
  • Berger, Michael F.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
84
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985901353
Cited by
115
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA204749, P50CA221745, R01CA227534, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
tumor type prediction, tissue of origin, cancer of unknown primary, mutational signatures, plasma cell-free DNA, liquid biopsy, metastatic breast cancer, artificial intelligence, precision oncology, cancer diagnosis
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review